Peer Review
-
Subject Areas on Research
- A Few Words of Introduction From Your New Diabetes Editorial Board.
- A new template for referees and guidance on writing high quality papers.
- ACC/AHA 2007 methodology for the development of clinical data standards: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards.
- ACCF/AHA clinical practice guideline methodology summit report: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.
- ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Cranial Neuropathy: 2022 Update.
- ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiologic Management of Infected Fluid Collections.
- Adoption of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in peer-reviewed literature.
- An investigation into nonscientist involvement in peer review: the National Institutes of Health example.
- Anesthesiology: Reflecting and Leading.
- Antitrust and hospital peer review.
- Avoiding predatory journals: Quick peer review processes too good to be true.
- Blind dates in sciences: dealing with rejection in peer review.
- Clinical trial Data and Safety Monitoring Boards. The search for a constitution.
- Comparing classifications of death in the Mode Selection Trial: agreement and disagreement among site investigators and a clinical events committee.
- Conducting a Peer Review: Novice or Expert.
- Design and Implementation of a Peer-Reviewed Medical Education Video Competition: The Best of American Thoracic Society Video Lecture Series.
- Editorial independence for CMAJ: signposts along the road.
- Educating the Next Generation of Peer Reviewers.
- Effect of acceptance or rejection on the author's evaluation of peer review of medical manuscripts.
- Evaluation and use of epidemiological evidence for environmental health risk assessment: WHO guideline document.
- Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers
- First Year Medical Student Peer Nominations of Professionalism: A Methodological Detective Story about Making Sense of Non-Sense.
- Global Emergency Medicine: A Review of the Literature From 2019.
- Great expectations.
- How does PLoS medicine manage competing interests?
- How to Train the Next Generation to Provide High-Quality Peer-Reviews.
- Impact of peer review in reduction of permanent pacemaker implantations.
- Implementation of remote 3-dimensional image guided radiation therapy quality assurance for radiation therapy oncology group clinical trials.
- Improving SARS-CoV-2 structures: Peer review by early coordinate release.
- In vitro fertilization and acupuncture: clinical efficacy and mechanistic basis.
- Interventions designed to increase the uptake of lung cancer screening and implications for priority populations: a scoping review protocol.
- Introducing The Wiley Transplant Peer Review Network.
- Introducing the Wiley Transplant Peer Review Network.
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Peer Review: Missed Liver Lesions on Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography.
- Managing the science in the presence of financial conflict of interest.
- Medicaid and CHIP Child Health Beneficiary Incentives: Program Landscape and Stakeholder Insights.
- Medical appropriateness of coronary angiograms.
- Medical student perspective: working toward specific and actionable clinical clerkship feedback.
- Nonscientist participation in the peer review process: is it desirable? Is it implementable? Who are the nonscientists who should become involved? A panel discussion.
- Open access publishing: a disruptive innovation
- Peer Review at the American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry-An Appeal to the Better Angels of Our Nature.
- Peer Review of Peer Review: Somewhere Over the Rainbow.
- Peer Review of Scholarly Work.
- Peer assessment of pediatric surgeons for potential risks of radiation exposure from computed tomography scans.
- Peer recommendations on how to improve clinical research, and Conference wrap-up.
- Practice patterns for peer review in radiation oncology.
- Predatory conferences: a systematic scoping review.
- Problems identified by secondary review of accepted manuscripts.
- Promoting patient safety through peer review.
- Regarding Mohan, Kuplian, and Willoughby, IJROBP 2000;46:575-580.
- Single-Blind and Double-Blind Peer Review: Effects on National Representation.
- Strategies for Addressing a Broader Definition of Conflicts of Interest.
- Study of Predatory Open Access Nursing Journals.
- Successful use of education and cost-based feedback strategies to reduce physician utilization of low-osmolality contrast agents in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.
- The (R)Evolution is here!
- The Evolution of the Journal Club: From Osler to Twitter.
- The Working Group report on Science-Based Categories for Abstracts: submitted to the annual scientific sessions. The Committee on Scientific Sessions Program (CSSP), American Heart Association.
- The art of peer review: Guidelines to become a credible and constructive peer reviewer.
- The changing face of peer review at the National Institutes of Health.
- The unintended consequences of portfolios in graduate medical education.
- Timing, delays and pathways to diagnosis of endometriosis: a scoping review protocol.
- Towards ubiquitous peer review strategies to sustain and enhance a clinical knowledge management framework.
- Trust in Peer Review.
- Unconscious Bias in Peer Review.
- Understanding errors in diagnostic radiology: proposal of a classification scheme and application to emergency radiology.
- Unjustified restrictions on letters to the editor.