Anesthetic neuroprotection: antecedents and an appraisal of preclinical and clinical data quality.

Published

Journal Article (Review)

Anesthetics have been studied for nearly fifty years as potential neuroprotective compounds in both perioperative and resuscitation medicine. Although anesthetics present pharmacologic properties consistent with preservation of brain viability in the context of an ischemic insult, no anesthetic has been proven efficacious for neuroprotection in humans. After such effort, it could be concluded that anesthetics are simply not neuroprotective in humans. Moreover, pharmacologic neuroprotection with non-anesthetic drugs has also repeatedly failed to be demonstrated in human acute brain injury. Recent focus has been on rectification of promising preclinical neuroprotection data and subsequent failed clinical trials. This has led to consensus guidelines for the process of transferring purported therapeutics from bench to bedside. In this review we first examined the history of anesthetic neuroprotection research. Then, a systematic review was performed to identify major clinical trials of anesthetic neuroprotection. Both the preclinical neuroprotection portfolio cited to justify a clinical trial and the design and conduct of that clinical trial were evaluated using modern standards that include the Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. In publications intended to define anesthetic neuroprotection, we found overall poor quality of both preclinical efficacy analysis portfolios and clinical trial designs and conduct. Hence, using current translational research standards, it was not possible to conclude from existing data whether anesthetics ameliorate perioperative ischemic brain injury. Incorporation of advances in translational neuroprotection research conduct may provide a basis for more definitive and potentially successful clinical trials of anesthetics as neuroprotectants.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Ishida, K; Berger, M; Nadler, J; Warner, DS

Published Date

  • 2014

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 20 / 36

Start / End Page

  • 5751 - 5765

PubMed ID

  • 24502575

Pubmed Central ID

  • 24502575

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1873-4286

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.2174/1381612820666140204111701

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United Arab Emirates