Skip to main content

Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Diaz, MT; Hogstrom, LJ; Zhuang, J; Voyvodic, JT; Johnson, MA; Camblin, CC
Published in: Front Hum Neurosci
2014

Language production requires multiple stages of processing (e.g., semantic retrieval, lexical selection), each of which may involve distinct brain regions. Distractor words can be combined with picture naming to examine factors that influence language production. Phonologically-related distractors have been found to speed picture naming (facilitation), while slower response times and decreased accuracy (interference) generally occur when a distractor is categorically related to the target image. However, other types of semantically-related distractors have been reported to produce a facilitative effect (e.g., associative, part-whole). The different pattern of results for different types of semantically-related distractors raises the question about how the nature of the semantic relation influences the effect of the distractor. To explore the nature of these semantic effects further, we used functional MRI to examine the influence of four types of written distractors on brain activation during overt picture naming. Distractors began with the same sound, were categorically-related, part of the object to be named, or were unrelated to the picture. Phonologically-related trials elicited greater activation than both semantic conditions (categorically-related and part-whole) in left insula and bilateral parietal cortex, regions that have been attributed to phonological aspects of production and encoding, respectively. Semantic conditions elicited greater activation than phonological trials in left posterior MTG, a region that has been linked to concept retrieval and semantic integration. Overall, the two semantic conditions did not differ substantially in their functional activation which suggests a similarity in the semantic demands and lexical competition across these two conditions.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Front Hum Neurosci

DOI

ISSN

1662-5161

Publication Date

2014

Volume

8

Start / End Page

167

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • Experimental Psychology
  • 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
  • 5202 Biological psychology
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 1702 Cognitive Sciences
  • 1701 Psychology
  • 1109 Neurosciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Diaz, M. T., Hogstrom, L. J., Zhuang, J., Voyvodic, J. T., Johnson, M. A., & Camblin, C. C. (2014). Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming. Front Hum Neurosci, 8, 167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00167
Diaz, Michele T., Larson J. Hogstrom, Jie Zhuang, James T. Voyvodic, Micah A. Johnson, and C Christine Camblin. “Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming.Front Hum Neurosci 8 (2014): 167. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00167.
Diaz MT, Hogstrom LJ, Zhuang J, Voyvodic JT, Johnson MA, Camblin CC. Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:167.
Diaz, Michele T., et al. “Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming.Front Hum Neurosci, vol. 8, 2014, p. 167. Pubmed, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00167.
Diaz MT, Hogstrom LJ, Zhuang J, Voyvodic JT, Johnson MA, Camblin CC. Written distractor words influence brain activity during overt picture naming. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:167.

Published In

Front Hum Neurosci

DOI

ISSN

1662-5161

Publication Date

2014

Volume

8

Start / End Page

167

Location

Switzerland

Related Subject Headings

  • Experimental Psychology
  • 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
  • 5202 Biological psychology
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 1702 Cognitive Sciences
  • 1701 Psychology
  • 1109 Neurosciences