PR interval identifies clinical response in patients with non-left bundle branch block: a Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy substudy.

Published

Conference Paper

BACKGROUND: In Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT), patients with non-left bundle branch block (LBBB; including right bundle branch block, intraventricular conduction delay) did not have clinical benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D). We hypothesized that baseline PR interval modulates clinical response to CRT-D therapy in patients with non-LBBB. METHODS AND RESULTS: Non-LBBB patients (n=537; 30%) were divided into 2 groups based on their baseline PR interval as normal (including minimally prolonged) PR (PR <230 ms) and prolonged PR (PR ≥230 ms). The primary end point was heart failure or death. Separate secondary end points included heart failure events and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare risk of end point events by CRT-D to implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in the PR subgroups. There were 96 patients (22%) with a prolonged PR and 438 patients (78%) with a normal PR interval. In non-LBBB patients with a prolonged PR interval, CRT-D treatment was associated with a 73% reduction in the risk of heart failure/death (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.57; P<0.001) and 81% decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.57; P<0.001) compared with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. In non-LBBB patients with normal PR, CRT-D therapy was associated with a trend toward an increased risk of heart failure/death (hazard ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.19; P=0.078; interaction P<0.001) and a more than 2-fold higher mortality (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.09; P=0.022; interaction P<0.001) compared with implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The data support the use of CRT-D in MADIT-CRT non-LBBB patients with a prolonged PR interval. In non-LBBB patients with a normal PR interval, implantation of a CRT-D may be deleterious. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT00180271.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Kutyifa, V; Stockburger, M; Daubert, JP; Holmqvist, F; Olshansky, B; Schuger, C; Klein, H; Goldenberg, I; Brenyo, A; McNitt, S; Merkely, B; Zareba, W; Moss, AJ

Published Date

  • August 2014

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 7 / 4

Start / End Page

  • 645 - 651

PubMed ID

  • 24963007

Pubmed Central ID

  • 24963007

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1941-3084

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001299

Conference Location

  • United States