Skip to main content

TH-302 plus gemcitabine (G+T) versus gemcitabine (G) in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer (PAC).

Publication ,  Conference
Ryan, DP; Reddy, SG; Bahary, N; Uronis, HE; Sigal, D; Cohn, AL; Schelman, WR; Stephenson, J; Eng, C; Borad, MJ
Published in: Journal of Clinical Oncology
February 1, 2013

325 Background: TH-302 is a hypoxia-targeted drug with a hypoxia-triggered 2-nitroimidazole component designed to release the DNA alkylator, bromo-isophosphoramide mustard (Br-IPM), when reduced in severe hypoxia. A randomized Phase 2B study (NCT01144455) was conducted to assess the benefit of G+T to standard dose G as first-line therapy of PAC. Methods: An open-label multi-center study of two dose levels of TH-302 (240 mg/m or 340 mg/m) in combination with G versus G alone (randomized 1:1:1). G (1,000 mg/m) and T were administered IV over 30-60 minutes on Days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients on the G could crossover after progression and be randomized to a G+T arm. The primary efficacy endpoint was a comparison of PFS between the combination arms and G alone (80% power to detect 50% improvement in PFS with one-sided alpha of 10%). Overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. Results: 214 pts were treated; 163 (76%) Stage IV and 51 (24%) Stage IIIB. Median age 65 (range 29-86); 126 M/88 F; 38% ECOG 0/62% ECOG 1. Receiving 6 or more cycles: 32% G; 45% G+T240; 55% G+T340. Median PFS was 3.6 mo in G vs 5.6 mo in G+T240 (p=0.06) and 6.0 mo in G+T340 (p=0.01). Median OS was 6.9 mo in G vs 8.7 in G+T240 (p=0.83) vs 9.2 mo in G+T340 (p=0.80). 6-mo OS was 57% in G vs 69% in G+T240 (p=0.12) and 73% in G+340 (p=0.04); 12-mo OS was 26% in G vs 37% in G+T240 (p=0.18) and 38% in G+340 (p=0.13). RECIST best response was 10% in G vs 17% in G+T240 and 26% in G+T340. 14 and 12 pts in G crossed over to T240 and T340, respectively. Median post crossover PFS was 1.8 mo in T240 vs 2.9 mo in T340 (p=0.13). Median post crossover OS was 2.6 mo in T240 vs 13.4 mo in T340 (p=0.01). AEs leading to discontinuation were: 16% G, 17% G+T240 and 12% G+T340. Rash (47% in G+T340) and stomatitis (42% in G+T340) were greater in combination, 3 pts Grd 3 rash. Grd 3/4 thrombocytopenia were 11% G, 39% G+T240 and 63% G+T340 and Grd 3/4 neutropenia were 31% G, 56% G+T240 and 60% G+T340. Conclusions: The combination of G plus TH-302 improved the PFS of G. Skin and mucosal toxicity and myelosuppression were the most common TH-302 related AEs with no increase in treatment discontinuation. A phase 3 study of TH-302 (340 mg/m) in combination with G is planned with OS as the primary efficacy endpoint. Clinical trial information: NCT01144455.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Clinical Oncology

DOI

EISSN

1527-7755

ISSN

0732-183X

Publication Date

February 1, 2013

Volume

31

Issue

4_suppl

Start / End Page

325 / 325

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ryan, D. P., Reddy, S. G., Bahary, N., Uronis, H. E., Sigal, D., Cohn, A. L., … Borad, M. J. (2013). TH-302 plus gemcitabine (G+T) versus gemcitabine (G) in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer (PAC). In Journal of Clinical Oncology (Vol. 31, pp. 325–325). American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.325
Ryan, David P., Shantan G. Reddy, Nathan Bahary, Hope Elizabeth Uronis, Darren Sigal, Allen Lee Cohn, William R. Schelman, Joe Stephenson, Clarence Eng, and Mitesh J. Borad. “TH-302 plus gemcitabine (G+T) versus gemcitabine (G) in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer (PAC).” In Journal of Clinical Oncology, 31:325–325. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2013. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.325.
Ryan DP, Reddy SG, Bahary N, Uronis HE, Sigal D, Cohn AL, et al. TH-302 plus gemcitabine (G+T) versus gemcitabine (G) in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer (PAC). In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO); 2013. p. 325–325.
Ryan, David P., et al. “TH-302 plus gemcitabine (G+T) versus gemcitabine (G) in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer (PAC).Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 31, no. 4_suppl, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2013, pp. 325–325. Crossref, doi:10.1200/jco.2013.31.4_suppl.325.
Ryan DP, Reddy SG, Bahary N, Uronis HE, Sigal D, Cohn AL, Schelman WR, Stephenson J, Eng C, Borad MJ. TH-302 plus gemcitabine (G+T) versus gemcitabine (G) in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer (PAC). Journal of Clinical Oncology. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO); 2013. p. 325–325.

Published In

Journal of Clinical Oncology

DOI

EISSN

1527-7755

ISSN

0732-183X

Publication Date

February 1, 2013

Volume

31

Issue

4_suppl

Start / End Page

325 / 325

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Related Subject Headings

  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences