The peer-review process: The good, the bad, the ugly, and the extraordinary
Publication
, Journal Article
Lewin, AY
Published in: Management and Organization Review
January 1, 2014
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
Management and Organization Review
DOI
EISSN
1740-8784
ISSN
1740-8776
Publication Date
January 1, 2014
Volume
10
Issue
2
Start / End Page
167 / 173
Related Subject Headings
- 3507 Strategy, management and organisational behaviour
- 3505 Human resources and industrial relations
- 1503 Business and Management
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lewin, A. Y. (2014). The peer-review process: The good, the bad, the ugly, and the extraordinary. Management and Organization Review, 10(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/more.12064
Lewin, A. Y. “The peer-review process: The good, the bad, the ugly, and the extraordinary.” Management and Organization Review 10, no. 2 (January 1, 2014): 167–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/more.12064.
Lewin AY. The peer-review process: The good, the bad, the ugly, and the extraordinary. Management and Organization Review. 2014 Jan 1;10(2):167–73.
Lewin, A. Y. “The peer-review process: The good, the bad, the ugly, and the extraordinary.” Management and Organization Review, vol. 10, no. 2, Jan. 2014, pp. 167–73. Scopus, doi:10.1111/more.12064.
Lewin AY. The peer-review process: The good, the bad, the ugly, and the extraordinary. Management and Organization Review. 2014 Jan 1;10(2):167–173.
Published In
Management and Organization Review
DOI
EISSN
1740-8784
ISSN
1740-8776
Publication Date
January 1, 2014
Volume
10
Issue
2
Start / End Page
167 / 173
Related Subject Headings
- 3507 Strategy, management and organisational behaviour
- 3505 Human resources and industrial relations
- 1503 Business and Management