Skip to main content

Deltoid ligament repair versus syndesmotic fixation in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Jones, CR; Nunley, JA
Published in: J Orthop Trauma
May 2015

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures treated with lateral malleolus open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with transsyndesmotic fixation versus lateral malleolus ORIF with deltoid ligament repair. DESIGN: Retrospective design. SETTING: Single level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Subjects with bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures were eligible for enrollment. Patients with posterior or medial malleolar fractures and age <16 years were excluded. Twenty-seven total subjects met inclusion criteria. Fifteen patients were treated with lateral malleolus ORIF with transsyndesmotic fixation, whereas 12 were treated with lateral malleolus ORIF with deltoid ligament repair. INTERVENTION: Lateral malleolus ORIF with transsyndesmotic fixation versus lateral malleolus ORIF with deltoid ligament repair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Lower Extremity Function Scale, Foot and Ankle Disability Index, Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, Visual Analog Pain Scale, and overall function of lower extremity. RESULTS: Univariate analysis of the outcome questionnaire variables demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups. All patients in the syndesmotic fixation group underwent a subsequent procedure for removal of the syndesmotic implant. Additionally, there were 2 complications in the syndesmotic group that required repeat operative intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Repairing the deltoid ligament at the time of lateral malleolus fixation demonstrates subjective, functional, and radiologic outcomes that are comparable with lateral malleolus fixation with syndesmotic fixation for bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures. The former avoids the costs and inherits surgical risks that occur during a subsequent operation for removal of the syndesmotic implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Orthop Trauma

DOI

EISSN

1531-2291

Publication Date

May 2015

Volume

29

Issue

5

Start / End Page

245 / 249

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Orthopedics
  • Male
  • Ligaments, Articular
  • Humans
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
  • Female
  • Ankle Joint
  • Ankle Fractures
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Jones, C. R., & Nunley, J. A. (2015). Deltoid ligament repair versus syndesmotic fixation in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 29(5), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000220
Jones, Christopher R., and James A. Nunley. “Deltoid ligament repair versus syndesmotic fixation in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures.J Orthop Trauma 29, no. 5 (May 2015): 245–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000000220.
Jones, Christopher R., and James A. Nunley. “Deltoid ligament repair versus syndesmotic fixation in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures.J Orthop Trauma, vol. 29, no. 5, May 2015, pp. 245–49. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000220.
Jones CR, Nunley JA. Deltoid ligament repair versus syndesmotic fixation in bimalleolar equivalent ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015 May;29(5):245–249.

Published In

J Orthop Trauma

DOI

EISSN

1531-2291

Publication Date

May 2015

Volume

29

Issue

5

Start / End Page

245 / 249

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Orthopedics
  • Male
  • Ligaments, Articular
  • Humans
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
  • Female
  • Ankle Joint
  • Ankle Fractures