Skip to main content

What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy? evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Grimes, CL; Lukacz, ES; Gantz, MG; Warren, LK; Brubaker, L; Zyczynski, HM; Richter, HE; Jelovsek, JE; Cundiff, G; Fine, P; Visco, AG; Zhang, M ...
Published in: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg
2014

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe posterior prolapse (pPOP) and obstructed defecation (OD) symptoms 5 years after open abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC). METHODS: We grouped the extended colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts trial participants with baseline and 5-year outcomes into 3 groups using baseline posterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) points and concomitant posterior repair (PR) (no PR, Ap <0; no PR, Ap ≥0; and +PR). Posterior colporrhaphy, perineorrhaphy, or sacrocolpoperineopexy were included as PR, which was performed at surgeon's discretion. Outcomes were dichotomized into presence/absence of pPOP (Ap ≥0) and OD symptoms (≥2 on 1 or more questions about digital assistance, excessive straining, or incomplete evacuation). Composite failure was defined by both pPOP and OD symptoms or pPOP reoperation. RESULTS: Ninety participants completed baseline and 5-year outcomes or were retreated with mean follow-up of 7.1 ± 1.0 years. Of those with no PR (Ap <0), 2 women (2/36; 9%) developed new pPOP with OD symptoms; 1 underwent subsequent PR. Nearly all (23/24; 96%) with no PR (Ap ≥0) demonstrated sustained resolution of pPOP, and none underwent PR. Fourteen percent (4/29) of +PR underwent repeat PR within 5 years, and 12% had recurrent pPOP. Regardless of PR, OD symptoms improved in all groups after ASC, although OD symptoms were still present in 17% to 19% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Symptomatic pPOP is common 5 years after ASC regardless of concomitant PR. Obstructed defecation symptoms may improve after ASC regardless of PR. Recurrent pPOP and/or reoperation was highest among those who received concomitant PR at ASC. Further studies identifying criteria for concomitant PR at the time of ASC are warranted.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg

DOI

EISSN

2154-4212

Publication Date

2014

Volume

20

Issue

5

Start / End Page

261 / 266

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sacrococcygeal Region
  • Reoperation
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
  • Female
  • Defecation
  • Colposcopy
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Grimes, C. L., Lukacz, E. S., Gantz, M. G., Warren, L. K., Brubaker, L., Zyczynski, H. M., … NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, . (2014). What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy? evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 20(5), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000085
Grimes, Cara L., Emily S. Lukacz, Marie G. Gantz, Lauren Klein Warren, Linda Brubaker, Halina M. Zyczynski, Holly E. Richter, et al. “What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy? evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 20, no. 5 (2014): 261–66. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000085.
Grimes CL, Lukacz ES, Gantz MG, Warren LK, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, et al. What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy? evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(5):261–6.
Grimes, Cara L., et al. “What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy? evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, vol. 20, no. 5, 2014, pp. 261–66. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000085.
Grimes CL, Lukacz ES, Gantz MG, Warren LK, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, Richter HE, Jelovsek JE, Cundiff G, Fine P, Visco AG, Zhang M, Meikle S, NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. What happens to the posterior compartment and bowel symptoms after sacrocolpopexy? evaluation of 5-year outcomes from E-CARE. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20(5):261–266.

Published In

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg

DOI

EISSN

2154-4212

Publication Date

2014

Volume

20

Issue

5

Start / End Page

261 / 266

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sacrococcygeal Region
  • Reoperation
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse
  • Middle Aged
  • Humans
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
  • Female
  • Defecation
  • Colposcopy