Online survey of nursing journal peer reviewers: indicators of quality in manuscripts.

Published

Journal Article

Nursing journal peer reviewers (N = 1,675) completed a 69-item online survey that assessed their views on manuscripts' contributions to nursing, priorities in writing reviews, use of journal impact factor, and other areas related to indicators of quality. They reported using contribution to knowledge or research evidence, topic of current interest, and newly emerging area as indicators of a manuscript's contribution to nursing. In writing their reviews, research rigor and clinical relevance of the manuscript were high priorities. Those familiar with the concept of impact factor were significantly more often not nurses; not United States residents; involved in research; and most often reviewed for journals that published only research or a scholarly mix of research, reviews, policy, and theory. When judging a paper's contribution, nursing journal peer reviewers weigh both research and clinical interests. Most reviewers do not use impact factors and place clinical considerations ahead of impact factors.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Dougherty, MC; Freda, MC; Kearney, MH; Baggs, JG; Broome, M

Published Date

  • June 2011

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 33 / 4

Start / End Page

  • 506 - 521

PubMed ID

  • 21078915

Pubmed Central ID

  • 21078915

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1552-8456

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0193-9459

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1177/0193945910385715

Language

  • eng