Variability of MDCT dose due to technologist performance: impact of posteroanterior versus anteroposterior localizer image and table height with use of automated tube current modulation.

Journal Article (Journal Article)

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine MDCT dose variability due to technologist variability in performing CT studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive adult patients who underwent two portal venous phase CT examinations of the abdomen and pelvis on the same 64-MDCT scanner between January and December 2011 were retrospectively identified. Tube voltage (kVp), tube current (mA), use of automated tube current modulation (ATCM), dose-length product (DLP), volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), table height, whether the localizer image was obtained using the posteroanterior or the anteroposterior technique, arm position, and number of overscanned slices were recorded. RESULTS: For a given patient, the total examination DLP difference comparing the two MDCT studies ranged from 0.1% to 238.0%. For the same patient, total examination DLP was always higher when the localizer image was obtained with the posteroanterior compared with the anteroposterior technique. When table position was closer to the x-ray source, patients appeared magnified in the posteroanterior localizer image (8-29%; average, 14%) and higher tube currents were selected with ATCM. Localizer technique, table height, arm position, number of overscanned slices, and technologist were all significant predictors of dose. CONCLUSION: Patient off-centering closer to the x-ray source resulted in patient magnification in the posteroanterior localizer image, leading to higher tube currents with ATCM and increased DLP. Differences in technologist, arm position, and overscanning also resulted in dose variability.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Harri, PA; Moreno, CC; Nelson, RC; Fani, N; Small, WC; Duong, P-AT; Tang, X; Applegate, KE

Published Date

  • August 2014

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 203 / 2

Start / End Page

  • 377 - 386

PubMed ID

  • 25055274

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1546-3141

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.2214/AJR.13.11608


  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States