Demographic and occupational predictors of early response to a mailed invitation to enroll in a longitudinal health study.

Published online

Journal Article

BACKGROUND: Often in survey research, subsets of the population invited to complete the survey do not respond in a timely manner and valuable resources are expended in recontact efforts. Various methods of improving response have been offered, such as reducing questionnaire length, offering incentives, and utilizing reminders; however, these methods can be costly. Utilizing characteristics of early responders (refusal or consent) in enrollment and recontact efforts may be a unique and cost-effective approach for improving the quality of epidemiologic research. METHODS: To better understand early responders of any kind, we compared the characteristics of individuals who explicitly refused, consented, or did not respond within 2 months from the start of enrollment into a large cohort study of US military personnel. A multivariate polychotomous logistic regression model was used to estimate the effect of each covariate on the odds of early refusal and on the odds of early consent versus late/non-response, while simultaneously adjusting for all other variables in the model. RESULTS: From regression analyses, we found many similarities between early refusers and early consenters. Factors associated with both early refusal and early consent included older age, higher education, White race/ethnicity, Reserve/Guard affiliation, and certain information technology and support occupations. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that early refusers may differ from late/non-responders, and that certain characteristics are associated with both early refusal and early consent to participate. Structured recruitment efforts that utilize these differences may achieve early response, thereby reducing mail costs and the use of valuable resources in subsequent contact efforts.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Chretien, J-P; Chu, LK; Smith, TC; Smith, B; Ryan, MAK; Millennium Cohort Study Team,

Published Date

  • January 25, 2007

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 7 /

Start / End Page

  • 6 -

PubMed ID

  • 17397558

Pubmed Central ID

  • 17397558

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1471-2288

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1186/1471-2288-7-6


  • eng

Conference Location

  • England