Flow-diversion panacea or poison?

Published online

Journal Article (Review)

Endovascular therapy is now the treatment of choice for intracranial aneurysms (IAs) for its efficacy and safety profile. The use of flow diversion (FD) has recently expanded to cover many types of IAs in various locations. Some institutions even attempt FD as first line treatment for unruptured IAs. The most widely used devices are the pipeline embolization device (PED), the SILK flow diverter (SFD), the flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED), and Surpass. Many questions were raised regarding the long-term complications, the optimal regimen of dual antiplatelet therapy, and the durability of treatment effect. We reviewed the literature to address these questions as well as other concerns on FD when treating IAs.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Zanaty, M; Chalouhi, N; Tjoumakaris, SI; Rosenwasser, RH; Gonzalez, LF; Jabbour, P

Published Date

  • 2014

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 5 /

Start / End Page

  • 21 -

PubMed ID

  • 24592254

Pubmed Central ID

  • 24592254

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1664-2295

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.3389/fneur.2014.00021

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • Switzerland