An in vitro study of pulsatile fluid dynamics in intracranial aneurysm models treated with embolic coils and flow diverters.


Journal Article

Although coil embolization is one of the most effective treatments for intracranial aneurysms (ICAs), the procedure is often unsuccessful. For example, an ICA may persist after coil embolization if deployed coils fail to block the flow of blood into the aneurysm. Unfortunately, the specific flow changes that are effected by embolic coiling (and other endovascular therapies) are poorly understood, which creates a barrier to the design and execution of optimal treatments in the clinic. We present an in vitro pulsatile flow study of treated basilar tip aneurysm models that elucidates relationships between controllable treatment parameters and clinically important post-treatment fluid dynamics. We also compare fluid dynamic performance across embolic coils and more recently proposed devices (e.g., the Pipeline Embolization Device) that focus on treating ICAs by diverting rather than blocking blood flow. In agreement with previous steady flow studies, coil embolization-reduced velocity magnitude at the aneurysmal neck by greater percentages for a narrow-neck aneurysm, and reduced flow into aneurysms by greater percentages at lower parent vessel flow rates. However, flow diversion reduced flow into a wide-neck aneurysm more so than coil embolization, regardless of flow conditions. Finally, results also showed that for the endovascular devices we examined, treatment effects were generally less dramatic under physiologic pulsatile flow conditions as compared to steady flow conditions. The fluid dynamic performance data presented in this study represent the first direct in vitro comparison of coils and flow diverters in aneurysm models, and provide a novel, quantitative basis to aid in designing endovascular treatments toward specific fluid dynamic outcomes.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Babiker, MH; Gonzalez, LF; Albuquerque, F; Collins, D; Elvikis, A; Zwart, C; Roszelle, B; Frakes, DH

Published Date

  • April 2013

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 60 / 4

Start / End Page

  • 1150 - 1159

PubMed ID

  • 23192467

Pubmed Central ID

  • 23192467

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1558-2531

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1109/TBME.2012.2228002


  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States