Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Benchmark pregnancy rates and the assessment of post-coital contraceptives: an update.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Li, D; Wilcox, AJ; Dunson, DB
Published in: Contraception
April 2015

In 2001, we provided benchmark estimates of probability of pregnancy given a single act of intercourse. Those calculations assumed that intercourse and ovulation are independent. Subsequent research has shown that this assumption is not valid. We provide here an update of previous benchmark estimates.We reanalyze earlier data from two North Carolina studies that collected daily urine samples and recorded daily intercourse for multiple menstrual cycles. One study comprised 68 sexually active women with either an intrauterine device or tubal ligation. The second was of 221 women who planned to become pregnant and had discontinued use of any birth control at enrollment. Participants had no known fertility problems. New statistical analyses were based on Monte Carlo simulations and Bayesian methods.The probability that a single act of intercourse occurs within a woman's fertile window is 25%, compared with 20% in previous calculations. The probability of pregnancy with intercourse on a given menstrual cycle day is correspondingly higher than previously estimated, with the largest increases occurring on menstrual days 12-22. These increases are, however, fairly small (for example, the peak chance of conception on menstrual day 13 increased from 8.6% to 9.7%).Previous benchmark rates of pregnancy with one act of intercourse were moderately underestimated due to a mistaken assumption about the independence of intercourse and ovulation.The chance of pregnancy with a single act of unprotected intercourse is greater than previously estimated. Previous benchmarks may underestimate the efficacy of post-coital contraception.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Contraception

DOI

EISSN

1879-0518

ISSN

0010-7824

Publication Date

April 2015

Volume

91

Issue

4

Start / End Page

344 / 349

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Pregnancy
  • Ovulation
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Contraceptives, Postcoital
  • Coitus
  • Adult
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Li, D., Wilcox, A. J., & Dunson, D. B. (2015). Benchmark pregnancy rates and the assessment of post-coital contraceptives: an update. Contraception, 91(4), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.002
Li, Daniel, Allen J. Wilcox, and David B. Dunson. “Benchmark pregnancy rates and the assessment of post-coital contraceptives: an update.Contraception 91, no. 4 (April 2015): 344–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.002.
Li D, Wilcox AJ, Dunson DB. Benchmark pregnancy rates and the assessment of post-coital contraceptives: an update. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):344–9.
Li, Daniel, et al. “Benchmark pregnancy rates and the assessment of post-coital contraceptives: an update.Contraception, vol. 91, no. 4, Apr. 2015, pp. 344–49. Epmc, doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.002.
Li D, Wilcox AJ, Dunson DB. Benchmark pregnancy rates and the assessment of post-coital contraceptives: an update. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):344–349.
Journal cover image

Published In

Contraception

DOI

EISSN

1879-0518

ISSN

0010-7824

Publication Date

April 2015

Volume

91

Issue

4

Start / End Page

344 / 349

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Pregnancy
  • Ovulation
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Contraceptives, Postcoital
  • Coitus
  • Adult