Scholars@Duke publication: Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone?

Preference Data for Environmental Valuation: Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches

Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone?

Publication , Chapter

González-Sepúlveda, JM; Loomis, JB

March 15, 2012

9780415774642

March 15, 2012

289 / 302

APA

Chicago

ICMJE

MLA

NLM

González-Sepúlveda, J. M., & Loomis, J. B. (2012). Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone? In Preference Data for Environmental Valuation: Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches (pp. 289–302).

González-Sepúlveda, J. M., and J. B. Loomis. “Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone?” In Preference Data for Environmental Valuation: Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches, 289–302, 2012.

González-Sepúlveda JM, Loomis JB. Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone? In: Preference Data for Environmental Valuation: Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches. 2012. p. 289–302.

González-Sepúlveda, J. M., and J. B. Loomis. “Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone?” Preference Data for Environmental Valuation: Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches, 2012, pp. 289–302.

González-Sepúlveda JM, Loomis JB. Are benefit transfers using a joint revealed and stated preference model more accurate than revealed and stated preference data alone? Preference Data for Environmental Valuation: Combining Revealed and Stated Approaches. 2012. p. 289–302.

9780415774642

March 15, 2012

289 / 302