Cardiovascular drug development: is it dead or just hibernating?
Despite the global burden of cardiovascular disease, investment in cardiovascular drug development has stagnated over the past 2 decades, with relative underinvestment compared with other therapeutic areas. The reasons for this trend are multifactorial, but of primary concern is the high cost of conducting cardiovascular outcome trials in the current regulatory environment that demands a direct assessment of risks and benefits, using clinically-evident cardiovascular endpoints. To work toward consensus on improving the environment for cardiovascular drug development, stakeholders from academia, industry, regulatory bodies, and government agencies convened for a think tank meeting in July 2014 in Washington, DC. This paper summarizes the proceedings of the meeting and aims to delineate the current adverse trends in cardiovascular drug development, understand the key issues that underlie these trends within the context of a recognized need for a rigorous regulatory review process, and provide potential solutions to the problems identified.
Fordyce, CB; Roe, MT; Ahmad, T; Libby, P; Borer, JS; Hiatt, WR; Bristow, MR; Packer, M; Wasserman, SM; Braunstein, N; Pitt, B; DeMets, DL; Cooper-Arnold, K; Armstrong, PW; Berkowitz, SD; Scott, R; Prats, J; Galis, ZS; Stockbridge, N; Peterson, ED; Califf, RM
Volume / Issue
Start / End Page
Pubmed Central ID
Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)
International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)