Skip to main content
Journal cover image

A comparison of radial and femoral access for cardiac catheterization.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Wagener, JF; Rao, SV
Published in: Trends Cardiovasc Med
November 2015

Over the past several years, the transradial approach (TRA) for cardiac catheterization has become increasingly adopted in the United States. The increased utilization of the TRA is grounded on 2 decades of research, showing reduced bleeding and vascular complications to complement improved patient quality of life. However, the concern over cost, radiation exposure, and acknowledged "learning curve" has kept the transfemoral approach (TFA) the mainstay of most US catheterization laboratories. More recent larger multi-centered randomized studies have aimed to address outcomes and these concerns between the TR and TF approaches. This article will review the changing trends in TRA in the US, discuss clinical (bleeding and mortality) and non-clinical (quality of life and cost) outcomes from recent randomized studies, and finally discuss certain aspects when it comes to adopting TRA.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Trends Cardiovasc Med

DOI

EISSN

1873-2615

Publication Date

November 2015

Volume

25

Issue

8

Start / End Page

707 / 713

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Assessment
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Radial Artery
  • Prognosis
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • Male
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Wagener, J. F., & Rao, S. V. (2015). A comparison of radial and femoral access for cardiac catheterization. Trends Cardiovasc Med, 25(8), 707–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2015.03.012
Wagener, John F., and Sunil V. Rao. “A comparison of radial and femoral access for cardiac catheterization.Trends Cardiovasc Med 25, no. 8 (November 2015): 707–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcm.2015.03.012.
Wagener JF, Rao SV. A comparison of radial and femoral access for cardiac catheterization. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Nov;25(8):707–13.
Wagener, John F., and Sunil V. Rao. “A comparison of radial and femoral access for cardiac catheterization.Trends Cardiovasc Med, vol. 25, no. 8, Nov. 2015, pp. 707–13. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.tcm.2015.03.012.
Wagener JF, Rao SV. A comparison of radial and femoral access for cardiac catheterization. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2015 Nov;25(8):707–713.
Journal cover image

Published In

Trends Cardiovasc Med

DOI

EISSN

1873-2615

Publication Date

November 2015

Volume

25

Issue

8

Start / End Page

707 / 713

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Assessment
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Radial Artery
  • Prognosis
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • Male