Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel
Journal cover image

No sex for science? Formative research on the acceptability and feasibility of a true contraceptive efficacy clinical trial.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Corneli, AL; Wong, C; Eley, NT; Mueller, MP; Rabenja, NL; Manzini, N; Swezey, T; Damme, KV; Smit, J; Behets, F
Published in: Contraception
March 2012

BACKGROUND: Recruitment challenges and restrictions on intercourse frequency and timing have stymied previous attempts to implement true contraceptive efficacy clinical trials. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative research was conducted in Madagascar, South Africa, and the United States to explore the acceptability of three potential true contraceptive efficacy study designs and the feasibility of recruitment for such trials, including characteristics of potential participants who may be willing to join. RESULTS: Participants preferred the study design with the least restrictive sex criteria: participants have sex with assigned contraceptive method/no method on days around ovulation and use condoms on other days. Participants suggested that condom adherence would be low. Differences were noted across sites on whether female participants should be actively seeking pregnancy or not actively seeking pregnancy but willing to accept a pregnancy. Recruitment of participants was expected to be difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that a true contraceptive efficacy clinical trial may not be feasible at this time in these settings.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Contraception

DOI

EISSN

1879-0518

Publication Date

March 2012

Volume

85

Issue

3

Start / End Page

263 / 269

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • South Africa
  • Sexual Behavior
  • Research Design
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Male
  • Madagascar
  • Intention
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Corneli, A. L., Wong, C., Eley, N. T., Mueller, M. P., Rabenja, N. L., Manzini, N., … Behets, F. (2012). No sex for science? Formative research on the acceptability and feasibility of a true contraceptive efficacy clinical trial. Contraception, 85(3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.004
Corneli, Amy L., Christina Wong, Natalie T. Eley, Monique Peloquin Mueller, Ny Lovaniaina Rabenja, Ntsiki Manzini, Teri Swezey, Kathleen Van Damme, Jenni Smit, and Frieda Behets. “No sex for science? Formative research on the acceptability and feasibility of a true contraceptive efficacy clinical trial.Contraception 85, no. 3 (March 2012): 263–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.004.
Corneli AL, Wong C, Eley NT, Mueller MP, Rabenja NL, Manzini N, et al. No sex for science? Formative research on the acceptability and feasibility of a true contraceptive efficacy clinical trial. Contraception. 2012 Mar;85(3):263–9.
Corneli, Amy L., et al. “No sex for science? Formative research on the acceptability and feasibility of a true contraceptive efficacy clinical trial.Contraception, vol. 85, no. 3, Mar. 2012, pp. 263–69. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.004.
Corneli AL, Wong C, Eley NT, Mueller MP, Rabenja NL, Manzini N, Swezey T, Damme KV, Smit J, Behets F. No sex for science? Formative research on the acceptability and feasibility of a true contraceptive efficacy clinical trial. Contraception. 2012 Mar;85(3):263–269.
Journal cover image

Published In

Contraception

DOI

EISSN

1879-0518

Publication Date

March 2012

Volume

85

Issue

3

Start / End Page

263 / 269

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • South Africa
  • Sexual Behavior
  • Research Design
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Male
  • Madagascar
  • Intention