The utility of cost discussions between patients with cancer and oncologists.

Published

Journal Article

OBJECTIVES: Patients with cancer can experience substantial financial burden. Little is known about patients' preferences for incorporating cost discussions into treatment decision making or about the ramifications of those discussions. The objective of this study was to determine patient preferences for and benefits of discussing costs with doctors. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional, survey study. METHODS: We enrolled insured adults with solid tumors on anticancer therapy who were treated at a referral cancer center or an affiliated rural cancer clinic. Patients were surveyed at enrollment and again 3 months later about cost discussions with doctors, decision making, and financial burden. Medical records were abstracted for disease and treatment data. Logistic regression investigated characteristics associated with greater desire to discuss costs. RESULTS: Of 300 patients (86% response rate), 52% expressed some desire to discuss treatment-related out-of-pocket costs with doctors and 51% wanted their doctor to take costs into account to some degree when making treatment decisions. However, only 19% had talked to their doctor about costs. Of those, 57% reported lower out-of-pocket costs as a result of cost discussions. In multivariable logistic regression, higher subjective financial distress was associated with greater likelihood to desire cost discussions (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.10-1.36). Nonwhite race was associated with lower likelihood to desire cost discussions (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.30-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cancer varied in their desire to discuss costs with doctors, but most who discussed costs believed the conversations helped reduce their expenses. Patient-physician cost communication might reduce out-of-pocket costs even in oncology where treatment options are limited.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Zafar, SY; Chino, F; Ubel, PA; Rushing, C; Samsa, G; Altomare, I; Nicolla, J; Schrag, D; Tulsky, JA; Abernethy, AP; Peppercorn, JM

Published Date

  • September 2015

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 21 / 9

Start / End Page

  • 607 - 615

PubMed ID

  • 26618364

Pubmed Central ID

  • 26618364

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1936-2692

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States