Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Contemporary Outcomes of Repeat Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Procedures.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kaneko, T; Vassileva, CM; Englum, B; Kim, S; Yammine, M; Brennan, M; Suri, RM; Thourani, VH; Jacobs, JP; Aranki, S
Published in: Ann Thorac Surg
October 2015

BACKGROUND: Reoperative aortic valve replacement (re-AVR) after previous AVR is a complex procedure involving redo sternotomy and removal of a previous prosthesis. With increasing use of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement for failed aortic bioprostheses, an evaluation of contemporary outcomes of re-AVR in patients with bioprostheses is warranted. METHODS: The study included 3,380 patients from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (July 2011 to September 2013) who underwent elective, isolated re-AVR after a previous AVR. Outcomes in these patients were compared with those of 54,183 patients with isolated primary AVR during the same period. A subgroup analysis of explanted bioprostheses in re-AVR (previous bioprosthetic valve: n = 2,213) was performed. RESULTS: Re-AVR patients were younger (66 vs 70 years, p < 0.001) compared with primary AVR patients. Re-AVR was associated with higher operative mortality (4.6% vs 2.2%, p < 0.0001), composite operative mortality and major morbidity (21.6% vs 11.8%, p < 0.0001), postoperative stroke (1.9% vs 1.4%, p = 0.02), postoperative aortic insufficiency mild or greater (2.8% vs 1.7%, p < 0.0001), pacemaker requirement (11.0% vs 4.3%, p < 0.0001), and vascular complications (0.06% vs 0.01%, p = 0.04). For the explanted previous bioprosthetic valve group, operative mortality was 4.7%, composite outcome was 21.9%, stroke rate was 1.8%, and pacemaker requirement was 11.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Re-AVR is now performed with an acceptable operative mortality, which is higher than primary AVR. The overall incidence of stroke, vascular complication, and postoperative aortic insufficiency was low although higher than primary AVR. These results may serve as a benchmark for future analysis of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement and may have an effect on future choice of transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs re-AVR.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Ann Thorac Surg

DOI

EISSN

1552-6259

Publication Date

October 2015

Volume

100

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1298 / 1304

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Risk Assessment
  • Respiratory System
  • Reoperation
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kaneko, T., Vassileva, C. M., Englum, B., Kim, S., Yammine, M., Brennan, M., … Aranki, S. (2015). Contemporary Outcomes of Repeat Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Procedures. Ann Thorac Surg, 100(4), 1298–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.062
Kaneko, Tsuyoshi, Christina M. Vassileva, Brian Englum, Sunghee Kim, Maroun Yammine, Matthew Brennan, Rakesh M. Suri, Vinod H. Thourani, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, and Sary Aranki. “Contemporary Outcomes of Repeat Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Procedures.Ann Thorac Surg 100, no. 4 (October 2015): 1298–1304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.062.
Kaneko T, Vassileva CM, Englum B, Kim S, Yammine M, Brennan M, et al. Contemporary Outcomes of Repeat Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Oct;100(4):1298–304.
Kaneko, Tsuyoshi, et al. “Contemporary Outcomes of Repeat Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Procedures.Ann Thorac Surg, vol. 100, no. 4, Oct. 2015, pp. 1298–304. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.062.
Kaneko T, Vassileva CM, Englum B, Kim S, Yammine M, Brennan M, Suri RM, Thourani VH, Jacobs JP, Aranki S. Contemporary Outcomes of Repeat Aortic Valve Replacement: A Benchmark for Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve Procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Oct;100(4):1298–1304.
Journal cover image

Published In

Ann Thorac Surg

DOI

EISSN

1552-6259

Publication Date

October 2015

Volume

100

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1298 / 1304

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Risk Assessment
  • Respiratory System
  • Reoperation
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
  • Female