Econometrics as observation: The lucas critique and the nature of econometric inference

Published

Book Section

© Cambridge University Press 1984, 1994, 2008. Kevin Hoover (1955–) received a D.Phil. in economics from Oxford University after an undergraduate major in philosophy, and his work reflects this dual competence. He has contributed both to contemporary economics (especially macroeconomics) and to economic methodology, serving for a decade as the editor of The Journal of Economic Methodology. After more than two decades at the University of California, Davis, Hoover is now a professor of economics and a professor of philosophy at Duke University. The Lucas Critique: Perhaps the principal challenge to the use of econometric models in economic analysis is the policy non-invariance argument, popularly known as the ‘Lucas critique’. Robert Lucas (1976) attacks the use of econometric models as bases for the evaluation of policy on the grounds that the estimated equations of such models are unlikely to remain invariant to the very changes in policy that the economist seeks to evaluate. The argument is originally cast as an implication of rational expectations. Among the constraints people face are the policy rules of the government. If people are rational, then, when these rules change, and if the change is correctly perceived, they take proper account of the change in adjusting their behavior. The rational expectations hypothesis implies that changes in policy will in fact be correctly perceived up to a serially uncorrelated error.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Hoover, KD

Published Date

  • January 1, 2007

Book Title

  • The Philosophy of Economics: An Anthology

Start / End Page

  • 297 - 314

International Standard Book Number 13 (ISBN-13)

  • 9780521883504

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1017/CBO9780511819025.021

Citation Source

  • Scopus