Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Mühlbacher, AC; Kaczynski, A; Zweifel, P; Johnson, FR
Published in: Health Econ Rev
December 2016

Best-worst scaling (BWS), also known as maximum-difference scaling, is a multiattribute approach to measuring preferences. BWS aims at the analysis of preferences regarding a set of attributes, their levels or alternatives. It is a stated-preference method based on the assumption that respondents are capable of making judgments regarding the best and the worst (or the most and least important, respectively) out of three or more elements of a choice-set. As is true of discrete choice experiments (DCE) generally, BWS avoids the known weaknesses of rating and ranking scales while holding the promise of generating additional information by making respondents choose twice, namely the best as well as the worst criteria. A systematic literature review found 53 BWS applications in health and healthcare. This article expounds possibilities of application, the underlying theoretical concepts and the implementation of BWS in its three variants: 'object case', 'profile case', 'multiprofile case'. This paper contains a survey of BWS methods and revolves around study design, experimental design, and data analysis. Moreover the article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the three types of BWS distinguished and offered an outlook. A companion paper focuses on special issues of theory and statistical inference confronting BWS in preference measurement.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Health Econ Rev

DOI

ISSN

2191-1991

Publication Date

December 2016

Volume

6

Issue

1

Start / End Page

2

Location

Germany

Related Subject Headings

  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 3801 Applied economics
  • 1402 Applied Economics
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Mühlbacher, A. C., Kaczynski, A., Zweifel, P., & Johnson, F. R. (2016). Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview. Health Econ Rev, 6(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x
Mühlbacher, Axel C., Anika Kaczynski, Peter Zweifel, and F Reed Johnson. “Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.Health Econ Rev 6, no. 1 (December 2016): 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x.
Mühlbacher AC, Kaczynski A, Zweifel P, Johnson FR. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview. Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):2.
Mühlbacher, Axel C., et al. “Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview.Health Econ Rev, vol. 6, no. 1, Dec. 2016, p. 2. Pubmed, doi:10.1186/s13561-015-0079-x.
Mühlbacher AC, Kaczynski A, Zweifel P, Johnson FR. Experimental measurement of preferences in health and healthcare using best-worst scaling: an overview. Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):2.
Journal cover image

Published In

Health Econ Rev

DOI

ISSN

2191-1991

Publication Date

December 2016

Volume

6

Issue

1

Start / End Page

2

Location

Germany

Related Subject Headings

  • 4203 Health services and systems
  • 3801 Applied economics
  • 1402 Applied Economics
  • 1117 Public Health and Health Services