Skip to main content

Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Seymour, NE; Gallagher, AG; Roman, SA; O'Brien, MK; Bansal, VK; Andersen, DK; Satava, RM
Published in: Annals of surgery
October 2002

To demonstrate that virtual reality (VR) training transfers technical skills to the operating room (OR) environment.The use of VR surgical simulation to train skills and reduce error risk in the OR has never been demonstrated in a prospective, randomized, blinded study.Sixteen surgical residents (PGY 1-4) had baseline psychomotor abilities assessed, then were randomized to either VR training (MIST VR simulator diathermy task) until expert criterion levels established by experienced laparoscopists were achieved (n = 8), or control non-VR-trained (n = 8). All subjects performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy with an attending surgeon blinded to training status. Videotapes of gallbladder dissection were reviewed independently by two investigators blinded to subject identity and training, and scored for eight predefined errors for each procedure minute (interrater reliability of error assessment r > 0.80).No differences in baseline assessments were found between groups. Gallbladder dissection was 29% faster for VR-trained residents. Non-VR-trained residents were nine times more likely to transiently fail to make progress (P <.007, Mann-Whitney test) and five times more likely to injure the gallbladder or burn nontarget tissue (chi-square = 4.27, P <.04). Mean errors were six times less likely to occur in the VR-trained group (1.19 vs. 7.38 errors per case; P <.008, Mann-Whitney test).The use of VR surgical simulation to reach specific target criteria significantly improved the OR performance of residents during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This validation of transfer of training skills from VR to OR sets the stage for more sophisticated uses of VR in assessment, training, error reduction, and certification of surgeons.

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Annals of surgery

DOI

EISSN

1528-1140

ISSN

0003-4932

Publication Date

October 2002

Volume

236

Issue

4

Start / End Page

458 / 463

Related Subject Headings

  • User-Computer Interface
  • Time Factors
  • Surgery
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Prospective Studies
  • Observer Variation
  • Male
  • Internship and Residency
  • Humans
  • General Surgery
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Seymour, N. E., Gallagher, A. G., Roman, S. A., O’Brien, M. K., Bansal, V. K., Andersen, D. K., & Satava, R. M. (2002). Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of Surgery, 236(4), 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008
Seymour, Neal E., Anthony G. Gallagher, Sanziana A. Roman, Michael K. O’Brien, Vipin K. Bansal, Dana K. Andersen, and Richard M. Satava. “Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.Annals of Surgery 236, no. 4 (October 2002): 458–63. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008.
Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of surgery. 2002 Oct;236(4):458–63.
Seymour, Neal E., et al. “Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.Annals of Surgery, vol. 236, no. 4, Oct. 2002, pp. 458–63. Epmc, doi:10.1097/00000658-200210000-00008.
Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK, Satava RM. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Annals of surgery. 2002 Oct;236(4):458–463.

Published In

Annals of surgery

DOI

EISSN

1528-1140

ISSN

0003-4932

Publication Date

October 2002

Volume

236

Issue

4

Start / End Page

458 / 463

Related Subject Headings

  • User-Computer Interface
  • Time Factors
  • Surgery
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Prospective Studies
  • Observer Variation
  • Male
  • Internship and Residency
  • Humans
  • General Surgery