Demonstrating and eliminating the aggregation effect in physical skill tasks

Published

Journal Article

Confidence judgments can be elicited in multiple ways. One of these procedures is to provide confidence judgments regarding each of a number of cases (individual judgments). A second procedure is to provide confidence judgments about a set of items (an aggregate judgment). Much research has demonstrated an aggregation effect-that individual judgments are more confident than aggregate judgments-within the cognitive knowledge domain. However, this effect has not previously been investigated with physical performance skill tasks. In three experiments, participants gave individual and aggregate judgments regarding the number of successful tosses they would make in either a ring toss, ping-pong toss, or basketball toss task. In keeping with the aggregation effect, individual judgments were more confident than were aggregate judgments of success. Additionally, we eliminated the aggregation effect in Experiments 2 and 3 by employing a case-specific base rate manipulation. Consistent with previous research with cognitive tasks, these results suggest that individual confidence judgments for physical skill tasks are determined primarily by characteristics associated with the individual case to be judged, whereas aggregate confidence judgments are determined by a more general evaluation of one's ability in the domain. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Stone, ER; Rittmayer, AD; Murray, NT; McNiel, JM

Published Date

  • January 1, 2011

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 24 / 1

Start / End Page

  • 1 - 22

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1099-0771

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0894-3257

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1002/bdm.675

Citation Source

  • Scopus