Skip to main content

Later Is Better: Projected USMLE Performance During Medical School

Publication ,  Journal Article
Petrusa, ER; Reilly, CG; Lee, LS
Published in: Teaching and Learning in Medicine
January 1, 1995

In this study, we investigated the performance of students from Years 1, 3, and 4 of medical school on sample United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) questions to predict actual performance and advise about the optimal time to take these tests. A unique curriculum and changes in the USMLE suggested that (a) students would do better on Step 1 after clerkships and (b) fourth-year students would do best on Step 2. Approximately 50% of students from the first, third, and fourth years volunteered to take Step I and Step 2 sample questions without preparation. Passing on both tests was 58% correct. For Step 1, significantly more fourth- than first- and third-year students passed. Expectedly for Step 2, significantly higher proportions of third- and fourth-year students passed than first-year students; however, fourth-year students did not score higher than third-year students. Using percent correct, fourth-year students did best on both tests. These results suggest that clinical experience will likely improve performance on Step 1, and an additional clinical year may improve performance on Step 2. Medical schools should consider allowing the USMLE to be taken later, possibly in the fourth year. Curriculum differences and other factors may limit the generalizability of these results. © 1995, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

DOI

EISSN

1532-8015

ISSN

1040-1334

Publication Date

January 1, 1995

Volume

7

Issue

3

Start / End Page

163 / 167

Related Subject Headings

  • Medical Informatics
  • 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy
  • 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Petrusa, E. R., Reilly, C. G., & Lee, L. S. (1995). Later Is Better: Projected USMLE Performance During Medical School. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 7(3), 163–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401339509539734
Petrusa, E. R., C. G. Reilly, and L. S. Lee. “Later Is Better: Projected USMLE Performance During Medical School.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine 7, no. 3 (January 1, 1995): 163–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401339509539734.
Petrusa ER, Reilly CG, Lee LS. Later Is Better: Projected USMLE Performance During Medical School. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 1995 Jan 1;7(3):163–7.
Petrusa, E. R., et al. “Later Is Better: Projected USMLE Performance During Medical School.” Teaching and Learning in Medicine, vol. 7, no. 3, Jan. 1995, pp. 163–67. Scopus, doi:10.1080/10401339509539734.
Petrusa ER, Reilly CG, Lee LS. Later Is Better: Projected USMLE Performance During Medical School. Teaching and Learning in Medicine. 1995 Jan 1;7(3):163–167.

Published In

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

DOI

EISSN

1532-8015

ISSN

1040-1334

Publication Date

January 1, 1995

Volume

7

Issue

3

Start / End Page

163 / 167

Related Subject Headings

  • Medical Informatics
  • 1302 Curriculum and Pedagogy
  • 1115 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences