Anticoagulation in coronary intervention.


Journal Article (Review)

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) induces thrombin generation and is associated with the risk of acute, subacute, or long-term ischaemic events. Therefore, intravenous anticoagulation is recommended to minimize thrombotic complications. The intensity and duration of anticoagulation needed are dependent on the clinical presentation (elective PCI for stable coronary artery disease, PCI for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes, or primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) and procedural features. As both ischaemic and periprocedural bleeding complications are associated with acute and long-term mortality, the optimal level of anticoagulation and the best agents are a matter of debate. Despite a number of limitations and the lack of large randomized clinical trials, unfractionated heparin (UFH) is still been used in the majority of interventions. Intravenous enoxaparin, a low-molecular-weight heparin, leads to a more predictable level of anticoagulation and has been compared with UFH in patients with elective PCI and primary PCI with favourable results. The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has been studied in numerous trials and consistently shown to reduce bleeding complications when compared with UFH with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. This review will summarize the current status of anticoagulation for PCI and the results of most recent trials and give recommendations for different clinical scenarios.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Zeymer, U; Rao, SV; Montalescot, G

Published Date

  • December 1, 2016

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 37 / 45

Start / End Page

  • 3376 - 3385

PubMed ID

  • 26946415

Pubmed Central ID

  • 26946415

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1522-9645

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw061


  • eng

Conference Location

  • England