Skip to main content

Safety and Use of Anticoagulation After Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Riaz, H; Alansari, SAR; Khan, MS; Riaz, T; Raza, S; Luni, FK; Khan, AR; Riaz, IB; Krasuski, RA
Published in: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
May 2016

BACKGROUND: The American College of Cardiology guidelines recommend 3 months of anticoagulation after replacement of the aortic valve with a bioprosthesis. However, there remains great variability in the current clinical practice and conflicting results from clinical studies. To assist clinical decision making, we pooled the existing evidence to assess whether anticoagulation in the setting of a new bioprosthesis was associated with improved outcomes or greater risk of bleeding. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched the PubMed database from the inception of these databases until April 2015 to identify original studies (observational studies or clinical trials) that assessed anticoagulation with warfarin in comparison with either aspirin or no antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. We included the studies if their outcomes included thromboembolism or stroke/transient ischemic attacks and bleeding events. Quality assessment was performed in accordance with the Newland Ottawa Scale, and random effects analysis was used to pool the data from the available studies. I(2) testing was done to assess the heterogeneity of the included studies. After screening through 170 articles, a total of 13 studies (cases=6431; controls=18210) were included in the final analyses. The use of warfarin was associated with a significantly increased risk of overall bleeding (odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-3.08; P<0.0001) or bleeding risk at 3 months (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.34; P<0.0001) compared with aspirin or placebo. With regard to composite primary outcome variables (risk of venous thromboembolism, stroke, or transient ischemic attack) at 3 months, no significant difference was seen with warfarin (odds ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.56; P=0.67). Moreover, anticoagulation was also not shown to improve outcomes at time interval >3 months (odds ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.58; P=0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the current guidelines, a meta-analysis of previous studies suggests that anticoagulation in the setting of an aortic bioprosthesis significantly increases bleeding risk without a favorable effect on thromboembolic events. Larger, randomized controlled studies should be performed to further guide this clinical practice.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

Publication Date

May 2016

Volume

9

Issue

3

Start / End Page

294 / 302

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Warfarin
  • Venous Thromboembolism
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Stroke
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Odds Ratio
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Riaz, H., Alansari, S. A. R., Khan, M. S., Riaz, T., Raza, S., Luni, F. K., … Krasuski, R. A. (2016). Safety and Use of Anticoagulation After Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 9(3), 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002696
Riaz, Haris, Shehab Ahmad Redha Alansari, Muhammad Shahzeb Khan, Talha Riaz, Sajjad Raza, Faraz Khan Luni, Abdur Rahman Khan, Irbaz Bin Riaz, and Richard A. Krasuski. “Safety and Use of Anticoagulation After Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 9, no. 3 (May 2016): 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002696.
Riaz H, Alansari SAR, Khan MS, Riaz T, Raza S, Luni FK, et al. Safety and Use of Anticoagulation After Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):294–302.
Riaz, Haris, et al. “Safety and Use of Anticoagulation After Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, vol. 9, no. 3, May 2016, pp. 294–302. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002696.
Riaz H, Alansari SAR, Khan MS, Riaz T, Raza S, Luni FK, Khan AR, Riaz IB, Krasuski RA. Safety and Use of Anticoagulation After Aortic Valve Replacement With Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):294–302.

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

Publication Date

May 2016

Volume

9

Issue

3

Start / End Page

294 / 302

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Warfarin
  • Venous Thromboembolism
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Stroke
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Odds Ratio