Should the Benefit of Transradial Access Still Be Questioned?
Publication
, Journal Article
Cohen, MG; Ohman, EM
Published in: JACC Cardiovasc Interv
May 9, 2016
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
DOI
EISSN
1876-7605
Publication Date
May 9, 2016
Volume
9
Issue
9
Start / End Page
908 / 910
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Radial Artery
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Humans
- Cardiovascular System & Hematology
- 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
- 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cohen, M. G., & Ohman, E. M. (2016). Should the Benefit of Transradial Access Still Be Questioned? JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 9(9), 908–910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.020
Cohen, Mauricio G., and E Magnus Ohman. “Should the Benefit of Transradial Access Still Be Questioned?” JACC Cardiovasc Interv 9, no. 9 (May 9, 2016): 908–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.020.
Cohen MG, Ohman EM. Should the Benefit of Transradial Access Still Be Questioned? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 9;9(9):908–10.
Cohen, Mauricio G., and E. Magnus Ohman. “Should the Benefit of Transradial Access Still Be Questioned?” JACC Cardiovasc Interv, vol. 9, no. 9, May 2016, pp. 908–10. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2016.03.020.
Cohen MG, Ohman EM. Should the Benefit of Transradial Access Still Be Questioned? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May 9;9(9):908–910.
Published In
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
DOI
EISSN
1876-7605
Publication Date
May 9, 2016
Volume
9
Issue
9
Start / End Page
908 / 910
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Radial Artery
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Humans
- Cardiovascular System & Hematology
- 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
- 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology