Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management

Published

Journal Article

The design and implementation of effective environmental policies need to be informed by a holistic understanding of the system processes (biophysical, social and economic), their complex interactions, and how they respond to various changes. Models, integrating different system processes into a unified framework, are seen as useful tools to help analyse alternatives with stakeholders, assess their outcomes, and communicate results in a transparent way. This paper reviews five common approaches or model types that have the capacity to integrate knowledge by developing models that can accommodate multiple issues, values, scales and uncertainty considerations, as well as facilitate stakeholder engagement. The approaches considered are: systems dynamics, Bayesian networks, coupled component models, agent-based models and knowledge-based models (also referred to as expert systems). We start by discussing several considerations in model development, such as the purpose of model building, the availability of qualitative versus quantitative data for model specification, the level of spatio-temporal detail required, and treatment of uncertainty. These considerations and a review of applications are then used to develop a framework that aims to assist modellers and model users in the choice of an appropriate modelling approach for their integrated assessment applications and that enables more effective learning in interdisciplinary settings. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Kelly, RA; Jakeman, AJ; Barreteau, O; Borsuk, ME; ElSawah, S; Hamilton, SH; Henriksen, HJ; Kuikka, S; Maier, HR; Rizzoli, AE; van Delden, H; Voinov, AA

Published Date

  • September 1, 2013

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 47 /

Start / End Page

  • 159 - 181

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1364-8152

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.05.005

Citation Source

  • Scopus