Skip to main content
construction release_alert
Scholars@Duke will be undergoing maintenance April 11-15. Some features may be unavailable during this time.
cancel

Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gedde, SJ; Heuer, DK; Parrish, RK; Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group,
Published in: Curr Opin Ophthalmol
March 2010

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) Study is a multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of tube-shunt surgery to trabeculectomy with mitomycin (MMC) in eyes with previous cataract and/or unsuccessful glaucoma surgery. This article reviews published results from the TVT Study. RECENT FINDINGS: Tube-shunt surgery had a higher success rate than trabeculectomy with MMC during the first 3 years of follow-up. Trabeculectomy with MMC produced greater intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction in the early postoperative period compared with tube-shunt placement, but similar IOPs were observed after 3 months. Tube-shunt surgery was associated with greater use of adjunctive-medical therapy than trabeculectomy with MMC during the first 2 years of the study, but no difference in medication use was seen at 3 years. The incidence of postoperative complications was higher after trabeculectomy with MMC compared with tube-shunt surgery, but serious complications associated with vision loss and/or reoperation developed with similar frequency after both surgical procedures. No difference in the rate of vision loss was present following trabeculectomy with MMC and tube-shunt surgery after 3 years of follow-up. Cataract progression was common, but occurred with similar frequency with both procedures. SUMMARY: Intermediate-term results of the TVT Study support the expanded use of tube shunts beyond refractory glaucomas. Tube-shunt surgery is an appropriate surgical option in patients who have undergone prior cataract and/or unsuccessful filtering surgery.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Curr Opin Ophthalmol

DOI

EISSN

1531-7021

Publication Date

March 2010

Volume

21

Issue

2

Start / End Page

123 / 128

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Trabeculectomy
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prosthesis Implantation
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Mitomycin
  • Lens Implantation, Intraocular
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gedde, S. J., Heuer, D. K., Parrish, R. K., & Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group, . (2010). Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 21(2), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360b68
Gedde, Steven J., Dale K. Heuer, Richard K. Parrish, and Richard K. Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. “Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study.Curr Opin Ophthalmol 21, no. 2 (March 2010): 123–28. https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360b68.
Gedde SJ, Heuer DK, Parrish RK, Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;21(2):123–8.
Gedde, Steven J., et al. “Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study.Curr Opin Ophthalmol, vol. 21, no. 2, Mar. 2010, pp. 123–28. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360b68.
Gedde SJ, Heuer DK, Parrish RK, Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study Group. Review of results from the Tube Versus Trabeculectomy Study. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010 Mar;21(2):123–128.

Published In

Curr Opin Ophthalmol

DOI

EISSN

1531-7021

Publication Date

March 2010

Volume

21

Issue

2

Start / End Page

123 / 128

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Trabeculectomy
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prosthesis Implantation
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Mitomycin
  • Lens Implantation, Intraocular
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Humans