Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Rural-Urban Differences in the Effect of Follow-Up Care on Postdischarge Outcomes.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Toth, M; Holmes, M; Van Houtven, C; Toles, M; Weinberger, M; Silberman, P
Published in: Health Serv Res
August 2017

OBJECTIVE: To assess rural-urban differences in quality of postdischarge care among Medicare beneficiaries, controlling for selection bias of postdischarge services. DATA SOURCES: The Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS), Cost and Use Files from 2000 to 2010, the Area Resource File, Provider of Services File, and the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 30- and 60-day hospital readmission, emergency department (ED) use, and mortality using two-stage residual inclusion; receipt of 14-day follow-up care was the main independent variable. DATA EXTRACTION METHOD: We defined index admission from the MCBS as any admission without a previous admission within 60 days. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Noninstrumental variables estimation was the preferred estimation strategy. Fourteen-day follow-up care reduced the risk of readmission, ED use, and mortality. There were no rural- urban differences in the effect of 14-day follow-up care on readmission and mortality. Rural beneficiaries experienced a greater effect of 14-day follow-up care on reducing 30-day ED use compared to urban beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: Follow-up care reduces 30- and 60-day readmission, ED use, and mortality. Rural and urban Medicare beneficiaries experience similar beneficial effects of follow-up care on the outcomes. Policies that improve follow-up care in rural settings may be beneficial.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Health Serv Res

DOI

EISSN

1475-6773

Publication Date

August 2017

Volume

52

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1473 / 1493

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urban Population
  • United States
  • Rural Population
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Patient Discharge
  • Medicare
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Toth, M., Holmes, M., Van Houtven, C., Toles, M., Weinberger, M., & Silberman, P. (2017). Rural-Urban Differences in the Effect of Follow-Up Care on Postdischarge Outcomes. Health Serv Res, 52(4), 1473–1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12543
Toth, Matthew, Mark Holmes, Courtney Van Houtven, Mark Toles, Morris Weinberger, and Pam Silberman. “Rural-Urban Differences in the Effect of Follow-Up Care on Postdischarge Outcomes.Health Serv Res 52, no. 4 (August 2017): 1473–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12543.
Toth M, Holmes M, Van Houtven C, Toles M, Weinberger M, Silberman P. Rural-Urban Differences in the Effect of Follow-Up Care on Postdischarge Outcomes. Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1473–93.
Toth, Matthew, et al. “Rural-Urban Differences in the Effect of Follow-Up Care on Postdischarge Outcomes.Health Serv Res, vol. 52, no. 4, Aug. 2017, pp. 1473–93. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12543.
Toth M, Holmes M, Van Houtven C, Toles M, Weinberger M, Silberman P. Rural-Urban Differences in the Effect of Follow-Up Care on Postdischarge Outcomes. Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1473–1493.
Journal cover image

Published In

Health Serv Res

DOI

EISSN

1475-6773

Publication Date

August 2017

Volume

52

Issue

4

Start / End Page

1473 / 1493

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urban Population
  • United States
  • Rural Population
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Patient Discharge
  • Medicare
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Female