Common methods for fecal sample storage in field studies yield consistent signatures of individual identity in microbiome sequencing data.

Journal Article (Journal Article)

Field studies of wild vertebrates are frequently associated with extensive collections of banked fecal samples-unique resources for understanding ecological, behavioral, and phylogenetic effects on the gut microbiome. However, we do not understand whether sample storage methods confound the ability to investigate interindividual variation in gut microbiome profiles. Here, we extend previous work on storage methods for gut microbiome samples by comparing immediate freezing, the gold standard of preservation, to three methods commonly used in vertebrate field studies: lyophilization, storage in ethanol, and storage in RNAlater. We found that the signature of individual identity consistently outweighed storage effects: alpha diversity and beta diversity measures were significantly correlated across methods, and while samples often clustered by donor, they never clustered by storage method. Provided that all analyzed samples are stored the same way, banked fecal samples therefore appear highly suitable for investigating variation in gut microbiota. Our results open the door to a much-expanded perspective on variation in the gut microbiome across species and ecological contexts.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Blekhman, R; Tang, K; Archie, EA; Barreiro, LB; Johnson, ZP; Wilson, ME; Kohn, J; Yuan, ML; Gesquiere, L; Grieneisen, LE; Tung, J

Published Date

  • August 2016

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 6 /

Start / End Page

  • 31519 -

PubMed ID

  • 27528013

Pubmed Central ID

  • PMC4985740

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 2045-2322

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 2045-2322

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1038/srep31519


  • eng