Assessing electronic health record phenotypes against gold-standard diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus.

Published

Journal Article

We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of 8 electronic health record (EHR)-based phenotypes for diabetes mellitus against gold-standard American Diabetes Association (ADA) diagnostic criteria via chart review by clinical experts.We identified EHR-based diabetes phenotype definitions that were developed for various purposes by a variety of users, including academic medical centers, Medicare, the New York City Health Department, and pharmacy benefit managers. We applied these definitions to a sample of 173 503 patients with records in the Duke Health System Enterprise Data Warehouse and at least 1 visit over a 5-year period (2007-2011). Of these patients, 22 679 (13%) met the criteria of 1 or more of the selected diabetes phenotype definitions. A statistically balanced sample of these patients was selected for chart review by clinical experts to determine the presence or absence of type 2 diabetes in the sample.The sensitivity (62-94%) and specificity (95-99%) of EHR-based type 2 diabetes phenotypes (compared with the gold standard ADA criteria via chart review) varied depending on the component criteria and timing of observations and measurements.Researchers using EHR-based phenotype definitions should clearly specify the characteristics that comprise the definition, variations of ADA criteria, and how different phenotype definitions and components impact the patient populations retrieved and the intended application. Careful attention to phenotype definitions is critical if the promise of leveraging EHR data to improve individual and population health is to be fulfilled.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Spratt, SE; Pereira, K; Granger, BB; Batch, BC; Phelan, M; Pencina, M; Miranda, ML; Boulware, E; Lucas, JE; Nelson, CL; Neely, B; Goldstein, BA; Barth, P; Richesson, RL; Riley, IL; Corsino, L; McPeek Hinz, ER; Rusincovitch, S; Green, J; Barton, AB; DDC Phenotype Group, ; Kelley, C; Hyland, K; Tang, M; Elliott, A; Ruel, E; Clark, A; Mabrey, M; Morrissey, KL; Rao, J; Hong, B; Pierre-Louis, M; Kelly, K; Jelesoff, N

Published Date

  • April 2017

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 24 / e1

Start / End Page

  • e121 - e128

PubMed ID

  • 27616701

Pubmed Central ID

  • 27616701

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1527-974X

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1067-5027

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1093/jamia/ocw123

Language

  • eng