Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Hepatitis C Virus Postexposure Prophylaxis in the Healthcare Worker: Why Direct-Acting Antivirals Don't Change a Thing.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Naggie, S; Holland, DP; Sulkowski, MS; Thomas, DL
Published in: Clin Infect Dis
January 1, 2017

Currently, 380 000-400 000 occupational exposures to blood-borne pathogens occur annually in the United States. The management for occupational HIV or hepatitis B virus exposures includes postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) when necessary; however, PEP is not recommended for hepatitis C virus (HCV) exposures. Recent approval of HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has renewed discussions as to whether these therapies could be used to prevent infection after exposure. There are no published studies addressing this question, but the prescribing of DAAs for PEP has been reported. We will discuss the differences in transmission of the 3 most common blood-borne pathogens, the natural history of early HCV infection, and the scientific rationale for PEP. In particular, we will discuss how the low feasibility of conducting an adequately powered clinical trial of DAA use for PEP and the low cost-effectiveness of such an intervention is not supportive of targeting limited resources for such use.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Clin Infect Dis

DOI

EISSN

1537-6591

Publication Date

January 1, 2017

Volume

64

Issue

1

Start / End Page

92 / 99

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Risk Assessment
  • Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
  • Occupational Exposure
  • Microbiology
  • Humans
  • Hepatitis C
  • Hepacivirus
  • Health Personnel
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Naggie, S., Holland, D. P., Sulkowski, M. S., & Thomas, D. L. (2017). Hepatitis C Virus Postexposure Prophylaxis in the Healthcare Worker: Why Direct-Acting Antivirals Don't Change a Thing. Clin Infect Dis, 64(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw656
Naggie, Susanna, David P. Holland, Mark S. Sulkowski, and David L. Thomas. “Hepatitis C Virus Postexposure Prophylaxis in the Healthcare Worker: Why Direct-Acting Antivirals Don't Change a Thing.Clin Infect Dis 64, no. 1 (January 1, 2017): 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw656.
Naggie S, Holland DP, Sulkowski MS, Thomas DL. Hepatitis C Virus Postexposure Prophylaxis in the Healthcare Worker: Why Direct-Acting Antivirals Don't Change a Thing. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 1;64(1):92–9.
Naggie, Susanna, et al. “Hepatitis C Virus Postexposure Prophylaxis in the Healthcare Worker: Why Direct-Acting Antivirals Don't Change a Thing.Clin Infect Dis, vol. 64, no. 1, Jan. 2017, pp. 92–99. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/cid/ciw656.
Naggie S, Holland DP, Sulkowski MS, Thomas DL. Hepatitis C Virus Postexposure Prophylaxis in the Healthcare Worker: Why Direct-Acting Antivirals Don't Change a Thing. Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 1;64(1):92–99.
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Infect Dis

DOI

EISSN

1537-6591

Publication Date

January 1, 2017

Volume

64

Issue

1

Start / End Page

92 / 99

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Risk Assessment
  • Post-Exposure Prophylaxis
  • Occupational Exposure
  • Microbiology
  • Humans
  • Hepatitis C
  • Hepacivirus
  • Health Personnel
  • Costs and Cost Analysis