Skip to main content

Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kreis, AJ; Nguyen, T; Rogers, S; Wang, JJ; Harazny, J; Michelson, G; Farouque, HMO; Wong, TY
Published in: Curr Eye Res
May 2008

PURPOSE: To assess reliability and reproducibility of different analysis methods for retinal capillary flow, volume, and velocity from scanning laser Doppler flowmetry (SLDF) topography. MATERIAL AND METHODS: SLDF topography analysis using the default retinal flowmeter (HRF) were compared to that using automatic full-field perfusion image analyzer (AFFPIA) and quantified as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: The AFFPIA full-field method had the highest reliability, with ICC 0.99 for capillary flow. The reproducibility using the AFFPIA full-field method was high ICC 0.74 for capillary flow. CONCLUSIONS: The AFFPIA full-field method is highly reliable and superior to the default HRF software.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Curr Eye Res

DOI

EISSN

1460-2202

Publication Date

May 2008

Volume

33

Issue

5

Start / End Page

493 / 499

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Retinal Vessels
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Observer Variation
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Laser-Doppler Flowmetry
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kreis, A. J., Nguyen, T., Rogers, S., Wang, J. J., Harazny, J., Michelson, G., … Wong, T. Y. (2008). Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. Curr Eye Res, 33(5), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680802069149
Kreis, Andreas J., Thanh Nguyen, Sophie Rogers, Jie Jin Wang, Joanna Harazny, Georg Michelson, HM Omar Farouque, and Tien Y. Wong. “Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry.Curr Eye Res 33, no. 5 (May 2008): 493–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680802069149.
Kreis AJ, Nguyen T, Rogers S, Wang JJ, Harazny J, Michelson G, et al. Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. Curr Eye Res. 2008 May;33(5):493–9.
Kreis, Andreas J., et al. “Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry.Curr Eye Res, vol. 33, no. 5, May 2008, pp. 493–99. Pubmed, doi:10.1080/02713680802069149.
Kreis AJ, Nguyen T, Rogers S, Wang JJ, Harazny J, Michelson G, Farouque HMO, Wong TY. Reliability of different image analysis methods for scanning laser Doppler flowmetry. Curr Eye Res. 2008 May;33(5):493–499.

Published In

Curr Eye Res

DOI

EISSN

1460-2202

Publication Date

May 2008

Volume

33

Issue

5

Start / End Page

493 / 499

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Retinal Vessels
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Ophthalmology & Optometry
  • Observer Variation
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Laser-Doppler Flowmetry
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • Humans
  • Female