The linguistics of color blind racism: How to talk nasty about blacks without sounding ãƒÆ’ã‚¢ãƒÂ¢ã¢â€šÂ¬ã‚¡ãƒâ€¦ã¢â‚¬Å“racistãƒÆ’ã‚¢ãƒÂ¢ã¢â€šÂ¬ã‚¡ãƒâ€šã‚

In this paper I argue that color blind racism, the central racial ideology of the post-civil rights era, has a peculiar style characterized by slipperiness, apparent nonracialism, and ambivalence. This style fi ts quite well the normative climate of the country as well as the central frames of color blind racism. I document in the paper fi ve stylistic components of this ideology, namely, (1) whites’ avoidance of direct racial language, (2) the central rhetorical strategies or ãƒÆ’ã‚¢ãƒÂ¢ã¢â‚¬Å¡ã‚¬ãƒâ€¦ã¢â‚¬Å“semantic movesãƒÆ’ã‚¢ãƒÂ¢ã¢â‚¬Å¡ã‚¬ãƒâ€šã‚ used by whites to safely express their racial views, (3) the role of projection, (4) the role of diminutives, and (5) how incursions into forbidden issues produce almost total incoherence among many whites. I conclude the paper with a discussion on how this style enhances the ideological menace of color blind racism. © 2002, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

Duke Scholars

Author Eduardo Bonilla-Silva Sociology