Invited commentary on 'different minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index when using the same sample of patients'.
Publication
, Journal Article
George, SZ
Published in: J Man Manip Ther
May 2013
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
J Man Manip Ther
DOI
ISSN
1066-9817
Publication Date
May 2013
Volume
21
Issue
2
Start / End Page
79 / 80
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Orthopedics
- 4207 Sports science and exercise
- 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
George, S. Z. (2013). Invited commentary on 'different minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index when using the same sample of patients'. J Man Manip Ther, 21(2), 79–80. https://doi.org/10.1179/1066981713Z.00000000057
George, Steven Z. “Invited commentary on 'different minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index when using the same sample of patients'.” J Man Manip Ther 21, no. 2 (May 2013): 79–80. https://doi.org/10.1179/1066981713Z.00000000057.
George, Steven Z. “Invited commentary on 'different minimal clinically important difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index when using the same sample of patients'.” J Man Manip Ther, vol. 21, no. 2, May 2013, pp. 79–80. Pubmed, doi:10.1179/1066981713Z.00000000057.
Published In
J Man Manip Ther
DOI
ISSN
1066-9817
Publication Date
May 2013
Volume
21
Issue
2
Start / End Page
79 / 80
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Orthopedics
- 4207 Sports science and exercise
- 4201 Allied health and rehabilitation science
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences
- 1103 Clinical Sciences