Recommendations for Addressing Harm-Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2.
Publication
, Journal Article
Laber, K; Newcomer, CE; Decelle, T; Everitt, JI; Guillen, J; Brønstad, A
Published in: Lab Anim
June 2016
International regulations and guidelines strongly suggest that the use of animal models in scientific research should be initiated only after the authority responsible for the review of animal studies has concluded a well-thought-out harm-benefit analysis (HBA) and deemed the project to be appropriate. The AALAS-FELASA working group on HBA has performed a literature review and based on this review, proposed a method for HBA. Examples of the working group's approach are included in this report.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
Lab Anim
DOI
EISSN
1758-1117
Publication Date
June 2016
Volume
50
Issue
1 Suppl
Start / End Page
21 / 42
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Veterinary Sciences
- Risk Factors
- Risk Assessment
- Humans
- Guidelines as Topic
- Animals, Laboratory
- Animals
- Animal Welfare
- Animal Experimentation
- 3009 Veterinary sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Laber, K., Newcomer, C. E., Decelle, T., Everitt, J. I., Guillen, J., & Brønstad, A. (2016). Recommendations for Addressing Harm-Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2. Lab Anim, 50(1 Suppl), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677216642397
Laber, Kathy, Christian E. Newcomer, Thierry Decelle, Jeffrey I. Everitt, Javier Guillen, and Aurora Brønstad. “Recommendations for Addressing Harm-Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2.” Lab Anim 50, no. 1 Suppl (June 2016): 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023677216642397.
Laber K, Newcomer CE, Decelle T, Everitt JI, Guillen J, Brønstad A. Recommendations for Addressing Harm-Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2. Lab Anim. 2016 Jun;50(1 Suppl):21–42.
Laber, Kathy, et al. “Recommendations for Addressing Harm-Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2.” Lab Anim, vol. 50, no. 1 Suppl, June 2016, pp. 21–42. Pubmed, doi:10.1177/0023677216642397.
Laber K, Newcomer CE, Decelle T, Everitt JI, Guillen J, Brønstad A. Recommendations for Addressing Harm-Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation - Report from the AALAS-FELASA Working Group on Harm-Benefit Analysis - Part 2. Lab Anim. 2016 Jun;50(1 Suppl):21–42.
Published In
Lab Anim
DOI
EISSN
1758-1117
Publication Date
June 2016
Volume
50
Issue
1 Suppl
Start / End Page
21 / 42
Location
England
Related Subject Headings
- Veterinary Sciences
- Risk Factors
- Risk Assessment
- Humans
- Guidelines as Topic
- Animals, Laboratory
- Animals
- Animal Welfare
- Animal Experimentation
- 3009 Veterinary sciences