Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Impact of Intraoperative Monitoring During Elective Complex Spinal Fusions (≥4 Levels) on 30-Day Complication and Readmission Rates: A Single-Institutional Study of 643 Adult Patients with Spinal Deformity.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Elsamadicy, AA; Adogwa, O; Lydon, E; Reddy, G; Kaakati, R; Sergesketter, A; Gottfried, ON; Karikari, IO
Published in: World Neurosurg
May 2017

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine if there are differences in 30-day postoperative complication and readmission rates between patients with spinal deformity undergoing complex spinal fusion with and without intraoperative monitoring (IOM). METHODS: The medical records of 643 adult patients with spine deformity undergoing elective complex spinal fusion (≥4 levels) at a major academic institution from 2005 to 2015 were reviewed. We identified 122 cases (19%) that involved IOM including electromyography, somatosensory evoked potential, and/or transcranial motor evoked potential and 521 (81%) that did not (IOM, n = 122; no-IOM, n = 521). The primary outcome investigated was the rate of 30-day postoperative complications and readmission. RESULTS: Patient demographics and comorbidities were similar between both groups, including age, gender, body mass index, and smoking status. IOM cases had significantly increased operative time (IOM, 360.9 ± 153.8 minutes vs. no-IOM, 290.3 ± 127.1 minutes; P < 0.0001), with no differences in the incidences of spinal cord injury, nerve injury, and durotomy. Both cohorts had similar postoperative complications and length of hospital stay, with the no-IOM cohort having a greater incidence of intensive care unit transfer (no-IOM, 27.1% vs. IOM, 16.1%, P = 0.015). There was no significant difference in 30-day readmission between the cohorts (IOM, 8.2% vs. no-IOM, 12.3%; P = 0.27) or differences in sensorimotor deficits. Although the overall 30-day complication rate trended to be higher in the no-IOM cohort, these factors were not attributed to IOM use. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the use of IOM may not have a significant impact on overall surgical outcomes and 30-day readmission rates.

Duke Scholars

Published In

World Neurosurg

DOI

EISSN

1878-8769

Publication Date

May 2017

Volume

101

Start / End Page

283 / 288

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Spinal Fusion
  • Spinal Diseases
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Patient Readmission
  • Monitoring, Intraoperative
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Elsamadicy, A. A., Adogwa, O., Lydon, E., Reddy, G., Kaakati, R., Sergesketter, A., … Karikari, I. O. (2017). Impact of Intraoperative Monitoring During Elective Complex Spinal Fusions (≥4 Levels) on 30-Day Complication and Readmission Rates: A Single-Institutional Study of 643 Adult Patients with Spinal Deformity. World Neurosurg, 101, 283–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.002
Elsamadicy, Aladine A., Owoicho Adogwa, Emily Lydon, Gireesh Reddy, Rayan Kaakati, Amanda Sergesketter, Oren N. Gottfried, and Isaac O. Karikari. “Impact of Intraoperative Monitoring During Elective Complex Spinal Fusions (≥4 Levels) on 30-Day Complication and Readmission Rates: A Single-Institutional Study of 643 Adult Patients with Spinal Deformity.World Neurosurg 101 (May 2017): 283–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.002.
Journal cover image

Published In

World Neurosurg

DOI

EISSN

1878-8769

Publication Date

May 2017

Volume

101

Start / End Page

283 / 288

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Spinal Fusion
  • Spinal Diseases
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Patient Readmission
  • Monitoring, Intraoperative
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans