Skip to main content

Making treatment effect inferences from multiple-baseline data: the utility of multilevel modeling approaches.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Ferron, JM; Bell, BA; Hess, MR; Rendina-Gobioff, G; Hibbard, ST
Published in: Behav Res Methods
May 2009

Multiple-baseline studies are prevalent in behavioral research, but questions remain about how to best analyze the resulting data. Monte Carlo methods were used to examine the utility of multilevel models for multiple-baseline data under conditions that varied in the number of participants, number of repeated observations per participant, variance in baseline levels, variance in treatment effects, and amount of autocorrelation in the Level 1 errors. Interval estimates of the average treatment effect were examined for two specifications of the Level 1 error structure (sigma(2)I and first-order autoregressive) and for five different methods of estimating the degrees of freedom (containment, residual, between-within, Satterthwaite, and Kenward-Roger). When the Satterthwaite or Kenward-Roger method was used and an autoregressive Level 1 error structure was specified, the interval estimates of the average treatment effect were relatively accurate. Conversely, the interval estimates of the treatment effect variance were inaccurate, and the corresponding point estimates were biased.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Behav Res Methods

DOI

ISSN

1554-351X

Publication Date

May 2009

Volume

41

Issue

2

Start / End Page

372 / 384

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Reference Values
  • Psychomotor Performance
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Models, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Experimental Psychology
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Behavioral Research
  • Algorithms
  • 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Ferron, J. M., Bell, B. A., Hess, M. R., Rendina-Gobioff, G., & Hibbard, S. T. (2009). Making treatment effect inferences from multiple-baseline data: the utility of multilevel modeling approaches. Behav Res Methods, 41(2), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.372
Ferron, John M., Bethany A. Bell, Melinda R. Hess, Gianna Rendina-Gobioff, and Susan T. Hibbard. “Making treatment effect inferences from multiple-baseline data: the utility of multilevel modeling approaches.Behav Res Methods 41, no. 2 (May 2009): 372–84. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.372.
Ferron JM, Bell BA, Hess MR, Rendina-Gobioff G, Hibbard ST. Making treatment effect inferences from multiple-baseline data: the utility of multilevel modeling approaches. Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):372–84.
Ferron, John M., et al. “Making treatment effect inferences from multiple-baseline data: the utility of multilevel modeling approaches.Behav Res Methods, vol. 41, no. 2, May 2009, pp. 372–84. Pubmed, doi:10.3758/BRM.41.2.372.
Ferron JM, Bell BA, Hess MR, Rendina-Gobioff G, Hibbard ST. Making treatment effect inferences from multiple-baseline data: the utility of multilevel modeling approaches. Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):372–384.

Published In

Behav Res Methods

DOI

ISSN

1554-351X

Publication Date

May 2009

Volume

41

Issue

2

Start / End Page

372 / 384

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Reference Values
  • Psychomotor Performance
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Models, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Experimental Psychology
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Behavioral Research
  • Algorithms
  • 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology