Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Xing, Y; Chen, TT; Simmons, WN; Sankin, G; Cocks, FH; Lipkin, ME; Preminger, GM; Zhong, P
Published in: J Endourol
May 2017

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of lithotripter focal width on stone fragmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified reflector was used to reduce -6 dB beam size of the HM3 lithotripter, while increasing concomitantly peak pressure. Fragmentation in vitro was assessed with modified and original reflectors using BegoStone phantoms. A membrane holder was used to mimic lithotripsy in vivo, and a matrix holder was used to assess variations of fragmentation power in the focal plane of the lithotripter field. Stone fragmentation in vivo produced by the two reflectors was further compared in a swine model. RESULTS: Stone fragmentation in vitro after 500 (or 2000) shocks was ∼60% (or ∼82%) vs ∼40% (or ∼75%) with original and modified reflector, respectively (p ≤ 0.0016). Fragmentation power with the modified reflector was the highest on the lithotripter axis, but dropped rapidly in the lateral direction and became insignificant at radial distances >6.0 mm. Stone fragmentation with the original reflector was lower along the lithotripter axis, but fragmentation power decayed slowly in lateral direction, with appreciable fragmentation produced at 6.0 mm. Stone fragmentation efficiency in vivo after 500 (or 2000) shocks was ∼70% (or ∼90%) vs ∼45% (or ∼80%) with original and modified reflector, respectively (p ≤ 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A lithotripter field with broad beam size yields superior stone comminution when compared with narrow beam size under comparable effective acoustic pulse energy both in vivo and in vitro. These findings may facilitate future improvements in lithotripter design to maximize comminution efficiency while minimizing tissue injury.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Endourol

DOI

EISSN

1557-900X

Publication Date

May 2017

Volume

31

Issue

5

Start / End Page

502 / 509

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Swine
  • Pressure
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Lithotripsy
  • Kidney Calculi
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Xing, Y., Chen, T. T., Simmons, W. N., Sankin, G., Cocks, F. H., Lipkin, M. E., … Zhong, P. (2017). Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields. J Endourol, 31(5), 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0560
Xing, Yifei, Tony T. Chen, Walter N. Simmons, Georgy Sankin, Franklin H. Cocks, Michael E. Lipkin, Glenn M. Preminger, and Pei Zhong. “Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.J Endourol 31, no. 5 (May 2017): 502–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0560.
Xing Y, Chen TT, Simmons WN, Sankin G, Cocks FH, Lipkin ME, et al. Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields. J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):502–9.
Xing, Yifei, et al. “Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields.J Endourol, vol. 31, no. 5, May 2017, pp. 502–09. Pubmed, doi:10.1089/end.2016.0560.
Xing Y, Chen TT, Simmons WN, Sankin G, Cocks FH, Lipkin ME, Preminger GM, Zhong P. Comparison of Broad vs Narrow Focal Width Lithotripter Fields. J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):502–509.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Endourol

DOI

EISSN

1557-900X

Publication Date

May 2017

Volume

31

Issue

5

Start / End Page

502 / 509

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Urology & Nephrology
  • Swine
  • Pressure
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Lithotripsy
  • Kidney Calculi
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Comparative Effectiveness Research