Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Black-Maier, E; Pokorney, SD; Barnett, AS; Zeitler, EP; Sun, AY; Jackson, KP; Bahnson, TD; Daubert, JP; Piccini, JP
Published in: Heart Rhythm
September 2017

BACKGROUND: Atrioesophageal fistula formation is a rare but life-threatening complication of atrial fibrillation ablation. Contact force (CF)-sensing catheters improve procedural effectiveness. However, the impact of the implementation of CF-sensing technology on the risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the association between the use of CF-sensing catheters and atrioesophageal fistula development. METHODS: We searched the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database for adverse event reports involving Food and Drug Administration-approved ablation catheters. RESULTS: Among 2689 device reports, we identified 78 atrioesophageal fistula cases, 65 of which involved CF-sensing catheters and 13 non-CF-sensing catheters. The percentage of total reports involving atrioeosphageal fistula was 5.4% for CF-sensing catheters (65 of 1202) and 0.9% for non-CF-sensing catheters (13 of 1487) (P < .0001). Procedural details (CF and power settings) were not consistently reported. Esophageal temperature increases were detected in only 2.5% of cases (2 of 78). The mean time to presentation was 16 ± 9 days. Overall mortality was at least 56%, with patients who underwent surgical repair more likely to survive than those treated with stenting or no intervention. CONCLUSION: Atrioesophageal fistula formation accounted for a much higher proportion of reported adverse events with CF-sensing catheters compared with non-CF-sensing catheters. Improved understanding of the relationship between power/force delivery and esophageal damage is needed to minimize the risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Heart Rhythm

DOI

EISSN

1556-3871

Publication Date

September 2017

Volume

14

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1328 / 1333

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Pulmonary Veins
  • Prognosis
  • Postoperative Complications
  • North Carolina
  • Male
  • Incidence
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Black-Maier, E., Pokorney, S. D., Barnett, A. S., Zeitler, E. P., Sun, A. Y., Jackson, K. P., … Piccini, J. P. (2017). Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm, 14(9), 1328–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.024
Black-Maier, Eric, Sean D. Pokorney, Adam S. Barnett, Emily P. Zeitler, Albert Y. Sun, Kevin P. Jackson, Tristram D. Bahnson, James P. Daubert, and Jonathan P. Piccini. “Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters.Heart Rhythm 14, no. 9 (September 2017): 1328–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.024.
Black-Maier E, Pokorney SD, Barnett AS, Zeitler EP, Sun AY, Jackson KP, et al. Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Sep;14(9):1328–33.
Black-Maier, Eric, et al. “Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters.Heart Rhythm, vol. 14, no. 9, Sept. 2017, pp. 1328–33. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.024.
Black-Maier E, Pokorney SD, Barnett AS, Zeitler EP, Sun AY, Jackson KP, Bahnson TD, Daubert JP, Piccini JP. Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Sep;14(9):1328–1333.
Journal cover image

Published In

Heart Rhythm

DOI

EISSN

1556-3871

Publication Date

September 2017

Volume

14

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1328 / 1333

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Pulmonary Veins
  • Prognosis
  • Postoperative Complications
  • North Carolina
  • Male
  • Incidence