Physician views regarding the benefits and burdens of prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele.
Journal Article (Journal Article)
OBJECTIVE: Examine how pediatric and obstetrical subspecialists view benefits and burdens of prenatal myelomeningocele (MMC) closure. STUDY DESIGN: Mail survey of 1200 neonatologists, pediatric surgeons and maternal-fetal medicine specialists (MFMs). RESULTS: Of 1176 eligible physicians, 670 (57%) responded. Most respondents disagreed (68%, 11% strongly) that open fetal surgery places an unacceptable burden on women and their families. Most agreed (65%, 10% strongly) that denying the benefits of open maternal-fetal surgery is unfair to the future child. Most (94%) would recommend prenatal fetoscopic over open or postnatal MMC closure for a hypothetical fetoscopic technique that had similar shunt rates (40%) but decreased maternal morbidity. When the hypothetical shunt rate for fetoscopy was increased to 60%, physicians were split (49% fetoscopy versus 45% open). Views about burdens and fairness correlated with the likelihood of recommending postnatal or fetoscopic over open closure. CONCLUSION: Individual and specialty-specific values may influence recommendations about prenatal surgery.
Full Text
Duke Authors
Cited Authors
- Antiel, RM; Collura, CA; Flake, AW; Johnson, MP; Rintoul, NE; Lantos, JD; Curlin, FA; Tilburt, JC; Brown, SD; Feudtner, C
Published Date
- September 2017
Published In
Volume / Issue
- 37 / 9
Start / End Page
- 994 - 998
PubMed ID
- 28617430
Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)
- 1476-5543
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
- 10.1038/jp.2017.75
Language
- eng
Conference Location
- United States