Physician views regarding the benefits and burdens of prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele.

Published

Journal Article

OBJECTIVE: Examine how pediatric and obstetrical subspecialists view benefits and burdens of prenatal myelomeningocele (MMC) closure. STUDY DESIGN: Mail survey of 1200 neonatologists, pediatric surgeons and maternal-fetal medicine specialists (MFMs). RESULTS: Of 1176 eligible physicians, 670 (57%) responded. Most respondents disagreed (68%, 11% strongly) that open fetal surgery places an unacceptable burden on women and their families. Most agreed (65%, 10% strongly) that denying the benefits of open maternal-fetal surgery is unfair to the future child. Most (94%) would recommend prenatal fetoscopic over open or postnatal MMC closure for a hypothetical fetoscopic technique that had similar shunt rates (40%) but decreased maternal morbidity. When the hypothetical shunt rate for fetoscopy was increased to 60%, physicians were split (49% fetoscopy versus 45% open). Views about burdens and fairness correlated with the likelihood of recommending postnatal or fetoscopic over open closure. CONCLUSION: Individual and specialty-specific values may influence recommendations about prenatal surgery.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Antiel, RM; Collura, CA; Flake, AW; Johnson, MP; Rintoul, NE; Lantos, JD; Curlin, FA; Tilburt, JC; Brown, SD; Feudtner, C

Published Date

  • September 2017

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 37 / 9

Start / End Page

  • 994 - 998

PubMed ID

  • 28617430

Pubmed Central ID

  • 28617430

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1476-5543

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1038/jp.2017.75

Language

  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States