Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Feiner, B; Jelovsek, JE; Maher, C
Published in: BJOG
January 2009

BACKGROUND: Vaginal mesh kits are being used to surgically treat apical vaginal prolapse; however, their safety and efficacy are currently unknown. OBJECTIVES: To summarise success and complication rates for commonly used vaginal mesh kits in the treatment of apical prolapse. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE and other scientific databases were queried for primary research addressing the use of vaginal mesh kits for apical prolapse published between 1950 and 2007, including abstracts presented in major scientific meetings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies describing the use of mesh to support either the anterior or posterior compartment alone, for incontinence or fistula repair or not addressing the vaginal apex were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Identified studies were grouped by the mesh kit and complications categorised using the Dindo classification system. Weighted averages and confidence intervals were calculated on objective success, follow-up length and complications. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty studies totalling 2653 women met inclusion criteria. Objective success rates (95% CI) were Apogee (American Medical Systems Inc., Minnetonka, MN, USA) 95% (95-96), Prolift (Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Somerville, NJ, USA) 87% (86-87) and posterior intravaginal slingplasty 88% (87-89). Reoperations not requiring anaesthesia (Dindo IIIa) occurred in 0.4-2.3% and requiring anaesthesia (Dindo IIIb) in 1.5-6.0%, with a follow up between 26 and 78 weeks. Mesh erosion was the most commonly reported complication occurring in 4.6-10.7%. AUTHOR'S CONCLUSIONS: Overall objective success using transvaginal mesh kits in restoring apical vaginal prolapse is high. However, an increasing number of women require surgical intervention for mesh-related complications based on limited data quality and short follow up. Further research addressing functional outcomes and the impact of these procedures on women's symptoms and quality of life is mandatory.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

BJOG

DOI

EISSN

1471-0528

Publication Date

January 2009

Volume

116

Issue

1

Start / End Page

15 / 24

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Surgical Mesh
  • Suburethral Slings
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Feiner, B., Jelovsek, J. E., & Maher, C. (2009). Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review. BJOG, 116(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02023.x
Feiner, B., J. E. Jelovsek, and C. Maher. “Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review.BJOG 116, no. 1 (January 2009): 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02023.x.
Feiner, B., et al. “Efficacy and safety of transvaginal mesh kits in the treatment of prolapse of the vaginal apex: a systematic review.BJOG, vol. 116, no. 1, Jan. 2009, pp. 15–24. Pubmed, doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02023.x.
Journal cover image

Published In

BJOG

DOI

EISSN

1471-0528

Publication Date

January 2009

Volume

116

Issue

1

Start / End Page

15 / 24

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Surgical Mesh
  • Suburethral Slings
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Humans
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
  • Female