Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Probabilistic inference under time pressure leads to a cortical-to-subcortical shift in decision evidence integration

Publication ,  Journal Article
Oh-Descher, H; Beck, JM; Ferrari, S; Sommer, MA; Egner, T
Published in: NeuroImage
November 15, 2017

Real-life decision-making often involves combining multiple probabilistic sources of information under finite time and cognitive resources. To mitigate these pressures, people “satisfice”, foregoing a full evaluation of all available evidence to focus on a subset of cues that allow for fast and “good-enough” decisions. Although this form of decision-making likely mediates many of our everyday choices, very little is known about the way in which the neural encoding of cue information changes when we satisfice under time pressure. Here, we combined human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with a probabilistic classification task to characterize neural substrates of multi-cue decision-making under low (1500 ms) and high (500 ms) time pressure. Using variational Bayesian inference, we analyzed participants’ choices to track and quantify cue usage under each experimental condition, which was then applied to model the fMRI data. Under low time pressure, participants performed near-optimally, appropriately integrating all available cues to guide choices. Both cortical (prefrontal and parietal cortex) and subcortical (hippocampal and striatal) regions encoded individual cue weights, and activity linearly tracked trial-by-trial variations in amount of evidence and decision uncertainty. Under increased time pressure, participants adaptively shifted to using a satisficing strategy by discounting the least informative cue in their decision process. This strategic change in decision-making was associated with an increased involvement of the dopaminergic midbrain, striatum, thalamus, and cerebellum in representing and integrating cue values. We conclude that satisficing the probabilistic inference process under time pressure leads to a cortical-to-subcortical shift in the neural drivers of decisions.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

NeuroImage

DOI

ISSN

1095-9572

Publication Date

November 15, 2017

Volume

162

Start / End Page

138 / 150

Publisher

Elsevier

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Time Factors
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Male
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Decision Making
  • Cues
  • Choice Behavior
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Oh-Descher, H., Beck, J. M., Ferrari, S., Sommer, M. A., & Egner, T. (2017). Probabilistic inference under time pressure leads to a cortical-to-subcortical shift in decision evidence integration. NeuroImage, 162, 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.069
Oh-Descher, H., J. M. Beck, S. Ferrari, M. A. Sommer, and T. Egner. “Probabilistic inference under time pressure leads to a cortical-to-subcortical shift in decision evidence integration.” NeuroImage 162 (November 15, 2017): 138–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.069.
Oh-Descher H, Beck JM, Ferrari S, Sommer MA, Egner T. Probabilistic inference under time pressure leads to a cortical-to-subcortical shift in decision evidence integration. NeuroImage. 2017 Nov 15;162:138–50.
Oh-Descher, H., et al. “Probabilistic inference under time pressure leads to a cortical-to-subcortical shift in decision evidence integration.” NeuroImage, vol. 162, Elsevier, Nov. 2017, pp. 138–50. Manual, doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.069.
Oh-Descher H, Beck JM, Ferrari S, Sommer MA, Egner T. Probabilistic inference under time pressure leads to a cortical-to-subcortical shift in decision evidence integration. NeuroImage. Elsevier; 2017 Nov 15;162:138–150.
Journal cover image

Published In

NeuroImage

DOI

ISSN

1095-9572

Publication Date

November 15, 2017

Volume

162

Start / End Page

138 / 150

Publisher

Elsevier

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Time Factors
  • Neurology & Neurosurgery
  • Male
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Decision Making
  • Cues
  • Choice Behavior