Skip to main content

Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications

Publication ,  Journal Article
Neville, KJ; Baka, J; Gamper-Rabindran, S; Bakker, K; Andreasson, S; Vengosh, A; Lin, A; Singh, JN; Weinthal, E
Published in: Annual Review of Environment and Resources
October 17, 2017

The extraction of unconventional oil and gas-from shale rocks, tight sand, and coalbed formations-is shifting the geographies of fossil fuel production, with complex consequences. Following Jackson et al.'s (1) natural science survey of the environmental consequences of hydraulic fracturing, this review examines social science literature on unconventional energy. After an overview of the rise of unconventional energy, the review examines energy economics and geopolitics, community mobilization, and state and private regulatory responses. Unconventional energy requires different frames of analysis than conventional energy because of three characteristics: increased drilling density, low-carbon and "clean" energy narratives of natural gas, and distinct ownership and royalty structures. This review points to the need for an interdisciplinary approach to analyzing the resulting dynamic, multilevel web of relationships that implicates land, water, food, and climate. Furthermore, the review highlights how scholarship on unconventional energy informs the broader energy landscape and contested energy futures.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

DOI

ISSN

1543-5938

Publication Date

October 17, 2017

Volume

42

Start / End Page

241 / 266

Related Subject Headings

  • Energy
  • Ecology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Neville, K. J., Baka, J., Gamper-Rabindran, S., Bakker, K., Andreasson, S., Vengosh, A., … Weinthal, E. (2017). Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061102
Neville, K. J., J. Baka, S. Gamper-Rabindran, K. Bakker, S. Andreasson, A. Vengosh, A. Lin, J. N. Singh, and E. Weinthal. “Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42 (October 17, 2017): 241–66. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061102.
Neville KJ, Baka J, Gamper-Rabindran S, Bakker K, Andreasson S, Vengosh A, et al. Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2017 Oct 17;42:241–66.
Neville, K. J., et al. “Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources, vol. 42, Oct. 2017, pp. 241–66. Scopus, doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-061102.
Neville KJ, Baka J, Gamper-Rabindran S, Bakker K, Andreasson S, Vengosh A, Lin A, Singh JN, Weinthal E. Debating Unconventional Energy: Social, Political, and Economic Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources. 2017 Oct 17;42:241–266.

Published In

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

DOI

ISSN

1543-5938

Publication Date

October 17, 2017

Volume

42

Start / End Page

241 / 266

Related Subject Headings

  • Energy
  • Ecology