Skip to main content

Patient-reported outcomes in cancer care - hearing the patient voice at greater volume.

Publication ,  Journal Article
LeBlanc, TW; Abernethy, AP
Published in: Nat Rev Clin Oncol
December 2017

Recording of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) enables direct measurement of the experiences of patients with cancer. In the past decade, the use of PROs has become a prominent topic in health-care innovation; this trend highlights the role of the patient experience as a key measure of health-care quality. Historically, PROs were used solely in the context of research studies, but a growing body of literature supports the feasibility of electronic collection of PROs, yielding reliable data that are sometimes of better quality than clinician-reported data. The incorporation of electronic PRO (ePRO) assessments into standard health-care settings seems to improve the quality of care delivered to patients with cancer. Such efforts, however, have not been widely adopted, owing to the difficulties of integrating PRO-data collection into clinical workflows and electronic medical-record systems. The collection of ePRO data is expected to enhance the quality of care received by patients with cancer; however, for this approach to become routine practice, uniquely trained people, and appropriate policies and analytical solutions need to be implemented. In this Review, we discuss considerations regarding measurements of PROs, implementation challenges, as well as evidence of outcome improvements associated with the use of PROs, focusing on the centrality of PROs as part of 'big-data' initiatives in learning health-care systems.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Nat Rev Clin Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1759-4782

Publication Date

December 2017

Volume

14

Issue

12

Start / End Page

763 / 772

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Quality Improvement
  • Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Neoplasms
  • Humans
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
LeBlanc, T. W., & Abernethy, A. P. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes in cancer care - hearing the patient voice at greater volume. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 14(12), 763–772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.153
LeBlanc, Thomas W., and Amy P. Abernethy. “Patient-reported outcomes in cancer care - hearing the patient voice at greater volume.Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14, no. 12 (December 2017): 763–72. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.153.
LeBlanc TW, Abernethy AP. Patient-reported outcomes in cancer care - hearing the patient voice at greater volume. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):763–72.
LeBlanc, Thomas W., and Amy P. Abernethy. “Patient-reported outcomes in cancer care - hearing the patient voice at greater volume.Nat Rev Clin Oncol, vol. 14, no. 12, Dec. 2017, pp. 763–72. Pubmed, doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.153.
LeBlanc TW, Abernethy AP. Patient-reported outcomes in cancer care - hearing the patient voice at greater volume. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):763–772.

Published In

Nat Rev Clin Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1759-4782

Publication Date

December 2017

Volume

14

Issue

12

Start / End Page

763 / 772

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Quality Improvement
  • Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Neoplasms
  • Humans
  • Delivery of Health Care, Integrated
  • 3211 Oncology and carcinogenesis
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis