Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Probability samples of area births versus clinic populations for reproductive epidemiology studies.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Savitz, DA; Dole, N; Kaczor, D; Herring, AH; Siega-Riz, AM; Kaufman, J; Thorp, JM
Published in: Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology
July 2005

Studies of pregnancy outcome are generally based either on geographically defined populations, often from birth records, or on clinic or hospital populations. We compared women recruited into a clinic-based study, the Pregnancy, Infection, and Nutrition (PIN) Study, with women who resided in the geographical area of the study (Alamance, Orange, and Wake Counties in North Carolina) and gave birth over the corresponding time period (1996-2000). Clinic participants were more likely to be Black, younger, have lower education, be unmarried, have a more frequent history of adverse pregnancy outcome, obtain prenatal care later, and smoke more cigarettes. Despite that profile, the proportion of clinic participants delivering preterm was somewhat lower than among area women overall (10.8% vs. 11.3%). Black/White risk ratios for preterm birth were markedly different for area (1.6) vs. clinic women (1.1), whereas other predictors were similar. Patterns may differ across groups for many reasons, including self-selection of clinics and varying clinical practices.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology

DOI

EISSN

1365-3016

ISSN

0269-5022

Publication Date

July 2005

Volume

19

Issue

4

Start / End Page

315 / 322

Related Subject Headings

  • Smoking
  • Single Person
  • Risk Factors
  • Probability
  • Prenatal Care
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstetric Labor, Premature
  • North Carolina
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Savitz, D. A., Dole, N., Kaczor, D., Herring, A. H., Siega-Riz, A. M., Kaufman, J., & Thorp, J. M. (2005). Probability samples of area births versus clinic populations for reproductive epidemiology studies. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 19(4), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00649.x
Savitz, David A., Nancy Dole, Diane Kaczor, Amy H. Herring, Anna Maria Siega-Riz, Jay Kaufman, and John M. Thorp. “Probability samples of area births versus clinic populations for reproductive epidemiology studies.Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 19, no. 4 (July 2005): 315–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00649.x.
Savitz DA, Dole N, Kaczor D, Herring AH, Siega-Riz AM, Kaufman J, et al. Probability samples of area births versus clinic populations for reproductive epidemiology studies. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2005 Jul;19(4):315–22.
Savitz, David A., et al. “Probability samples of area births versus clinic populations for reproductive epidemiology studies.Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 19, no. 4, July 2005, pp. 315–22. Epmc, doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2005.00649.x.
Savitz DA, Dole N, Kaczor D, Herring AH, Siega-Riz AM, Kaufman J, Thorp JM. Probability samples of area births versus clinic populations for reproductive epidemiology studies. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2005 Jul;19(4):315–322.
Journal cover image

Published In

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology

DOI

EISSN

1365-3016

ISSN

0269-5022

Publication Date

July 2005

Volume

19

Issue

4

Start / End Page

315 / 322

Related Subject Headings

  • Smoking
  • Single Person
  • Risk Factors
  • Probability
  • Prenatal Care
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy
  • Obstetric Labor, Premature
  • North Carolina
  • Humans