Evaluating the addition of bevacizumab (Bev) to endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for hormone-receptor positive (HR+)/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC): Pooled-analysis from the LEA (GEICAM/2006-11_GBG51) and CALGB 40503 (Alliance) trials.

Published

Conference Paper

1012 Background: Data from randomized trials comparing ET v ET-Bev in 1st line HR+/HER2- ABC pts showed controversial results. We performed a pooled-analysis of two randomized trials (LEA and CALGB 40503) to refine the Bev value in this patient population. Methods: We analysed 749 ABC pts with ET (letrozole-673, tamoxifen-39, fulvestrant 250mg-37) +/- Bev. Primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were: safety; other efficacy (overall response rate [ORR], clinical benefit rate [CBR] and overall survival [OS]) in all pts; and efficacy in de novo pts and by previous endocrine-sensitivity (-/+ 24 months [mo] without recurrence under ET in adjuvant setting). Multivariable Cox models were fitted for PFS adjusted by study co-variables and controlled for study level differences. Results: Median age was 61 years (yr) (range: 25-87); 40% had de novo ABC and 60% recurrent disease (with disease free interval of ≤ 1 yr in 5%, 1-2 yr in 7% and > 2 yr in 88%); 82% of recurrent pts had previous ET sensitivity. Median PFS was 14.3 mo in the ET arm v 19 mo in the ET+Bev arm (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.91; p<0.01). ORR and CBR with ET v ET+Bev were 40 v 61% (p<0.01) and 64 v 77% (p<0.01). OS did not differ between arms (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.77-1.18; p=0.68). PFS for de novo ABC pts was 14.6 and 19.3 mo in the ET and ET+Bev arms (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.63-1.06; p=0.13). PFS differed between arms for previous sensitive pts (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.53-0.89; p=0.004) but not for ET-resistant pts (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.4-1.3; p=0.29). Grade 3-5 hypertension (2.2 v 20.1%), proteinuria (0 v 9.3%), cardiovascular events (0.5 v 4.2%) and liver events (0 v 2.9%) were significantly higher in the ET+Bev arm (all p<0.01). Multivariable analyses showed age (p<0.01), PgR status (p<0.01), type of prior ET (p<0.01) and treatment arm (p<0.01) to be associated with PFS. Conclusions: The addition of Bev to ET increased PFS but not OS. Analyses to define subgroups with prolonged benefit from ET alone or ET-Bev are ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Genentech, Roche. Clinical trial information: NCT00545077 / NCT00601900.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Martin, M; Loibl, S; Hyslop, T; de la Haba-Rodriguez, J; Aktas, B; Cirrincione, C; Carrasco, EM; Mehta, K; Barry, WT; Morales, S; Carey, LA; Garcia Saenz, JA; Partridge, A; Martinez, N; Hahn, OM; Winer, EP; Guerrero, A; Hudis, C; Casas, M; Dickler, MN

Published Date

  • May 20, 2017

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 35 / 15_suppl

Start / End Page

  • 1012 - 1012

Published By

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1527-7755

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 0732-183X

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.1012