Skip to main content

Neural differences between covert and overt attention studied using EEG with simultaneous remote eye tracking

Publication ,  Journal Article
Kulke, LV; Atkinson, J; Braddick, O; Lebedev, M; König, P; Reilly, RB; Danckert, J; Brunner, P
Published in: Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
November 23, 2016

Research on neural mechanisms of attention has generally instructed subjects to direct attention covertly while maintaining a fixed gaze. This study combined simultaneous eye tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) to measure neural attention responses during exogenous cueing in overt attention shifts (with saccadic eye movements to a target) and compared these with covert attention shifts (responding manually while maintaining central fixation). EEG analysis of the period preceding the saccade latency showed similar occipital response amplitudes for overt and covert shifts, although response latencies differed. However, a frontal positivity was greater during covert attention shifts, possibly reflecting saccade inhibition to maintain fixation. The results show that combined EEG and eye tracking can be successfully used to study natural overt shifts of attention (applicable to non-verbal infants) and that requiring inhibition of saccades can lead to additional frontal responses. Such data can be used to refine current neural models of attention that have been mainly based on covert shifts.

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

DOI

EISSN

1662-5161

Publication Date

November 23, 2016

Volume

10

Issue

NOV2016

Related Subject Headings

  • Experimental Psychology
  • 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
  • 5202 Biological psychology
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 1702 Cognitive Sciences
  • 1701 Psychology
  • 1109 Neurosciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Kulke, L. V., Atkinson, J., Braddick, O., Lebedev, M., König, P., Reilly, R. B., … Brunner, P. (2016). Neural differences between covert and overt attention studied using EEG with simultaneous remote eye tracking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(NOV2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00592
Kulke, L. V., J. Atkinson, O. Braddick, M. Lebedev, P. König, R. B. Reilly, J. Danckert, and P. Brunner. “Neural differences between covert and overt attention studied using EEG with simultaneous remote eye tracking.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10, no. NOV2016 (November 23, 2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00592.
Kulke LV, Atkinson J, Braddick O, Lebedev M, König P, Reilly RB, et al. Neural differences between covert and overt attention studied using EEG with simultaneous remote eye tracking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2016 Nov 23;10(NOV2016).
Kulke, L. V., et al. “Neural differences between covert and overt attention studied using EEG with simultaneous remote eye tracking.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. NOV2016, Nov. 2016. Scopus, doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00592.
Kulke LV, Atkinson J, Braddick O, Lebedev M, König P, Reilly RB, Danckert J, Brunner P. Neural differences between covert and overt attention studied using EEG with simultaneous remote eye tracking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2016 Nov 23;10(NOV2016).

Published In

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

DOI

EISSN

1662-5161

Publication Date

November 23, 2016

Volume

10

Issue

NOV2016

Related Subject Headings

  • Experimental Psychology
  • 5204 Cognitive and computational psychology
  • 5202 Biological psychology
  • 3209 Neurosciences
  • 1702 Cognitive Sciences
  • 1701 Psychology
  • 1109 Neurosciences